Structure of Airblast Sprays Under High Ambient Pressure Conditions
Author:
Zheng Q. P.1, Jasuja A. K.1, Lefebvre A. H.1
Affiliation:
1. School of Mechanical Engineering, Cranfield University, Cranfield, Bedford MK43 0AL United Kingdom
Abstract
A single-velocity-component phase Doppler particle analyzer is used to survey and measure local variations in drop-size distributions and drop velocities in the nearnozzle region of a practical, contraswirling, prefilming airblast atomizer. The technique of laser sheet imaging is used to obtain global patterns of the spray. All measurements are taken with a constant pressure drop across the atomizer of 5 percent, at ambient air pressures of 1, 6, and 12 bar. The liquid employed is aviation kerosine at flow rates up to 75 g/s. The results show that increasing the air pressure from 1 to 12 bar at a constant air/fuel ratio causes the initial spray cone angle to widen from 70 to 105 deg. Farther downstream the spray volume remains largely unaffected by variations in atomizer operating conditions. However, the radial distribution of fuel within the spray volume is such that increases in fuel flow rate cause a larger proportion of fuel to be contained in the outer regions of the spray. The effect of ambient pressure on the overall Sauter mean diameter is small. This is attributed to the fact that the rapid disintegration of the fuel sheet produced by the contraswirling air streams ensures that the atomization process is dominated by the “prompt” mechanism. For this mode of liquid breakup, theory predicts that mean drop sizes are independent of air pressure.
Publisher
ASME International
Subject
Mechanical Engineering,Energy Engineering and Power Technology,Aerospace Engineering,Fuel Technology,Nuclear Energy and Engineering
Reference18 articles.
1. El-Shanawany
M. S. M. R.
, and LefebvreA. H., 1980, “Airblast Atomization: The Effects of Linear Scale on Mean Drop Size,” J. Energy, Vol. 4, No. 4, pp. 184–189. 2. Hebrard, P., Trichet, P., and Bardey, X., 1991, “Experimental Investigation of Two-Phase Flow in the Near Field of an Airblast Atomizer,” Fifth International Conference on Liquid Atomization and Spray Systems, Gaithersberg, MD, pp. 669–678. 3. Hebrard, P., Lavergne, G., Beard, P., Donnadille, P., and Trichet, P., 1993, “Modelisation de las Phase Liquide dans les Chambres de Combustion,” AGARD Conference Proceedings 536, pp. 36/1–12. 4. Jasuja
A. K.
, 1979, “Atomization of Crude and Residual Fuel Oils,” ASME JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING FOR POWER, Vol. 101, No. 2, pp. 250–258. 5. Jasuja
A. K.
, 1981, “Airblast Atomization of Alternative Liquid Petroleum Fuels Under High Pressure Conditions,” ASME Journal of Engineering for Power, Vol. 103, pp. 514–518.
Cited by
24 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|