Where Do We Start? Guidance for Technology Implementation in Maintenance Management for Manufacturing

Author:

Brundage Michael P.1,Sexton Thurston1,Hodkiewicz Melinda2,Morris KC1,Arinez Jorge3,Ameri Farhad4,Ni Jun5,Xiao Guoxian3

Affiliation:

1. National Institute of Standards and Technology, Systems Integration Division, Gaithersburg, MD 20814 e-mail:

2. Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA 6009, Australia e-mail:

3. GM Research and Development Center, Manufacturing Systems Research Lab, Warren, MI 48090 e-mail:

4. Department of Engineering Technology, Texas State University, San Marcos, TX 78666 e-mail:

5. Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 e-mail:

Abstract

Recent efforts in smart manufacturing (SM) have proven quite effective at elucidating system behavior using sensing systems, communications, and computational platforms, along with statistical methods to collect and analyze the real-time performance data. However, how do you effectively select where and when to implement these technology solutions within manufacturing operations? Furthermore, how do you account for the human-driven activities in manufacturing when inserting new technologies? Due to a reliance on human problem-solving skills, today’s maintenance operations are largely manual processes without wide-spread automation. The current state-of-the-art maintenance management systems and out-of-the-box solutions do not directly provide necessary synergy between human and technology, and many paradigms ultimately keep the human and digital knowledge systems separate. Decision makers are using one or the other on a case-by-case basis, causing both human and machine to cannibalize each other’s function, leaving both disadvantaged despite ultimately having common goals. A new paradigm can be achieved through a hybridized system approach—where human intelligence is effectively augmented with sensing technology and decision support tools, including analytics, diagnostics, or prognostic tools. While these tools promise more efficient, cost-effective maintenance decisions and improved system productivity, their use is hindered when it is unclear what core organizational or cultural problems they are being implemented to solve. To explicitly frame our discussion about implementation of new technologies in maintenance management around these problems, we adopt well-established error mitigation frameworks from human factors experts—who have promoted human–system integration for decades—to maintenance in manufacturing. Our resulting tiered mitigation strategy guides where and how to insert SM technologies into a human-dominated maintenance management process.

Publisher

ASME International

Subject

Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering,Computer Science Applications,Mechanical Engineering,Control and Systems Engineering

Reference92 articles.

1. AS IEC 60300.3.11 Dependability Management Application Guide—Reliability-Centred Maintenance;IEC,2011

2. The Costs and Benefits of Advanced Maintenance in Manufacturing;Thomas,2018

3. The Analysis of Return on Investment for PHM Applied to Electronic Systems;Feldman,2008

4. Reverse Engineering Costs: How Much Will a Prognostic Algorithm Save;Drummond,2008

5. Model Evaluation for Prognostics: Estimating Cost Saving for the End Users;Yang,2007

Cited by 19 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3