Affiliation:
1. Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Illinois at Chicago
2. Department of Mathematical Sciences, Clemson University
3. Department of Mechanical Engineering, Clemson University
Abstract
In robust design, associated with each quality characteristic, the design objective often involves multiple aspects such as “bringing the mean of performance on target” and “minimizing the variations.” Current ways of handling these multiple aspects using either the Taguchi’s signal-to-noise ratio or the weighted-sum method are not adequate. In this paper, we solve bi-objective robust design problems from a utility perspective by following upon the recent developments on relating utility function optimization to a Compromise Programming (CP) method. A robust design procedure is developed to allow a designer to express his/her preference structure of multiple aspects of robust design. The CP approach, i.e., the Tchebycheff method, is then used to determine the robust design solution which is guaranteed to belong to the set of efficient solutions (Pareto points). The quality utility at the candidate solution is represented by means of a quadratic function in a certain sense equivalent to the weighted Tchebycheff metric. The obtained utility function can be used to explore the set of efficient solutions in a neighborhood of the candidate solution. The iterative nature of our proposed procedure will assist decision making in quality engineering and the applications of robust design.
Subject
Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design,Computer Science Applications,Mechanical Engineering,Mechanics of Materials
Reference37 articles.
1. Athan T. W. , and PapalambrosP. Y., 1996, “A Note on Weighted Criteria Methods for Compromise Solutions in Multi-Objective Optimization,” Engineering Optimization, Vol. 27, pp. 155–176.
2. Ballestro E. , and RomeroC., 1991, “A Theorem Connecting Utility Function Optimization and Compromise Programming,” Operations Research Letters, Vol. 10, pp. 421–427.
3. Bazaraa, M. S., Sherali, H. D., and Shetty, C. M., 1993, Nonlinear Programming—Theory and Algorithms, John Wiley & Sons, New York.
4. Bowman V. J. , 1976, “On the Relationship of the Tchebycheff Norm and the Efficient Frontier of Multiple-Criteria Objectives,” Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems, Vol. 135, pp. 76–85.
5. Box G. , 1988, “Signal-to-Noise Ratios, Performance Criteria, and Transformations,” Technometrics, Vol. 30, No. 1, pp. 1–18.
Cited by
220 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献