Slug Detection as a Tool for Predictive Control of GLCC© Compact Separators
Author:
Earni Shankar1, Wang Shoubo1, Mohan Ram S.1, Shoham Ovadia1, Marrelli Jack D.2
Affiliation:
1. Mechanical and Petroleum Engineering Departments, The University of Tulsa, Tulsa, OK 74104 2. ChevronTexaco, E&P Technology Division, Humble, TX 77338
Abstract
Current design and performance of the GLCC©1 separator is dependent on the prediction of the upstream inlet flow conditions based on available models. It is expected that early detection of terrain slugging (slug length, slug velocity and holdup) and controlling the liquid level in the GLCC using feed forward mechanism can improve the operational range of the GLCC, by decreasing the gas carry under and liquid carry over, and thereby decreasing the control valve dynamics. The conventional feedback control loops can seldom achieve perfect control considering the impact of huge slugs that are keeping the output of the process continuously away from desired set point value. The reason is simple: a feedback controller reacts only after it has detected a deviation in the value of the level from the set point. Unlike the feedback systems, a feed forward control configuration measures the disturbance directly and takes control action to negate the effect of the disturbance on liquid level in the GLCC. Therefore, a feed forward control system has the theoretical potential for perfect control if the slug detection and characterization are perfect. A strategy for GLCC predictive control has been proposed which integrates the feedback and feed forward loops to compensate for error due to modeling and slug characterization. A model has been developed for predictive control system design and simulated in MATLAB-Simulink®. Experimental results obtained demonstrate that the proposed strategy is a viable approach for GLCC predictive control.
Publisher
ASME International
Subject
Geochemistry and Petrology,Mechanical Engineering,Energy Engineering and Power Technology,Fuel Technology,Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment
Reference14 articles.
1. Marrelli, J. D., Tallet, M., Yocum, B., Dunbar, D., Mohan, R. S., and Shoham, O., 2000, “Methods for Optimal Matching of Separation and Metering Facilities for Performance, Cost, and Size: Practical Examples from Duri Area 10 Expansion” ETCE00-ER-10165, proceedings of the ETCE 2000 Conference of ASME Petroleum Division of ASME Petroleum Division, February 14–17, 2000. 2. Andreussi, P., Bendiksen, K. H., and Nydal, O. J., 1993, “Void Distribution in Slug Flow,” Int. J. Multiphase Flow, 19(5), pp. 817–828. 3. Dhulesia, H., Bernicot, M., and Romanet, T., 1995, “Field Installation of an Acoustic Slug-Detection System,” presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Dallas, October 22–25, pp. 285–291. 4. Barnea, D., Shoham, O., Taitel, Y., and Dukler, A. E., 1980, “Flow Pattern Characterization for Two-Phase Flow by Electrical Conductance Probe,” Int. J. Multiphase Flow, 6, pp. 387–397. 5. Wang, S., 1997, “Control System Analysis of Gas-Liquid Cylindrical Cyclone Separators,” M.S. thesis, The University of Tulsa.
Cited by
6 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|