Processing Aleatory and Epistemic Uncertainties in Experimental Data From Sparse Replicate Tests of Stochastic Systems for Real-Space Model Validation

Author:

Romero Vicente J.1,Black Amalia R.1

Affiliation:

1. V&V, UQ, and Credibility Processes Department, Sandia National Laboratories, P.O. Box 5800, Albuquerque, NM 87185-0828

Abstract

Abstract This paper presents a practical methodology for propagating and processing uncertainties associated with random measurement and estimation errors (that vary from test-to-test) and systematic measurement and estimation errors (uncertain but similar from test-to-test) in inputs and outputs of replicate tests to characterize response variability of stochastically varying test units. Also treated are test condition control variability from test-to-test and sampling uncertainty due to limited numbers of replicate tests. These aleatory variabilities and epistemic uncertainties result in uncertainty on computed statistics of output response quantities. The methodology was developed in the context of processing experimental data for “real-space” (RS) model validation comparisons against model-predicted statistics and uncertainty thereof. The methodology is flexible and sufficient for many types of experimental and data uncertainty, offering the most extensive data uncertainty quantification (UQ) treatment of any model validation method the authors are aware of. It handles both interval and probabilistic uncertainty descriptions and can be performed with relatively little computational cost through use of simple and effective dimension- and order-adaptive polynomial response surfaces in a Monte Carlo (MC) uncertainty propagation approach. A key feature of the progressively upgraded response surfaces is that they enable estimation of propagation error contributed by the surrogate model. Sensitivity analysis of the relative contributions of the various uncertainty sources to the total uncertainty of statistical estimates is also presented. The methodologies are demonstrated on real experimental validation data involving all the mentioned sources and types of error and uncertainty in five replicate tests of pressure vessels heated and pressurized to failure. Simple spreadsheet procedures are used for all processing operations.

Publisher

ASME International

Subject

Computational Theory and Mathematics,Computer Science Applications,Modelling and Simulation,Statistics and Probability

Reference48 articles.

1. Application of a Versatile ‘Real Space’ Validation Methodology to a Fire Model;AIAA J. Thermophys. Heat Transfer,2010

2. Comparison of Several Model Validation Conceptions Against a ‘Real Space’ End-to-End Approach;Soc. Automot. Eng. Int. J. Mater. Manuf.,2011

3. Application of UQ and V&V to Experiments and Simulations of Heated Pipes Pressurized to Failure;Mehta;Simulation Credibility—Advances in Verification, Validation, and Uncertainty Quantification,2016

4. Experimental Data Uncertainty, Calibration, and Validation of a Viscoelastic Potential Energy Clock Model for Inorganic Sealing Glasses,2016

5. Uncertainty Quantification and Model Validation for III-V SSICs in Annular Core Research Reactor Shots,2016

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3