Affiliation:
1. Department of Industrial and Operations Engineering, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109
2. Design Laboratory, Department of Mechanical Engineering, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109
Abstract
Generating a sequence of motions for removing components in a three-dimensional assembly, one at a time, is considered—the robot motion being strictly translational. We map the boundary representation of a given assembly to a tree structure called Disassembly Tree (DT). Traversing the DT in pre- and post-order yields a minimal sequence of operations for disassembly and assembly, respectively. In this paper, an assembly is classified by the logical complexity of its DT (an ordered graph whose nodes are components of the given assembly) and by the geometric complexity of the nodes in DT (in terms of the number of motions needed to remove a single component). Next, whether a component can be removed in one motion is described as a predicate. This predicate is then used in an algorithm for constructing the DT. For a class of assemblies that exhibit total ordering, the algorithm decides whether each component can be removed in a single motion, by constructing a DT in O(N log N) time, on the average, where N is the total number of mating faces in the assembly.
Cited by
95 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Decreasing Number of Geometric Feasibility Checks in Automatic Assembly Planning: A Review;2023 IEEE 24th International Conference of Young Professionals in Electron Devices and Materials (EDM);2023-06-29
2. Analysis of Geometric Obstacles in the Assembly of Complex Products: A Lattice-Theoretic Approach;2023 International Conference on Industrial Engineering, Applications and Manufacturing (ICIEAM);2023-05-15
3. An Efficient Disassembly Sequencing Scheme Using the Shell Structure;Computer-Aided Design;2023-01
4. OPTIMIZATION OF ASSEMBLY PATHS THROUGH A QUANTIFICATION OF ASSEMBLY DIFFICULTY;Proceeding of Flexible Automation and Integrated Manufacturing 1999;2023
5. DESING FOR DISASSEMBLY VIA VIRTUAL PROTOTYPING;Proceeding of Flexible Automation and Integrated Manufacturing 1996;2023