An Investigation of the NOCSAE Linear Impactor Test Method Based on In Vivo Measures of Head Impact Acceleration in American Football

Author:

Gwin Joseph T.1,Chu Jeffery J.2,Diamond Solomon G.3,Halstead P. David4,Crisco Joseph J.5,Greenwald Richard M.6

Affiliation:

1. Simbex, Lebanon, NH 03766; Thayer School of Engineering at Dartmouth, Hanover, NH 03755; Division of Kinesiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-2214

2. Simbex, Lebanon, NH 03766

3. Thayer School of Engineering at Dartmouth, Hanover, NH 03755

4. Sports Biomechanics Impact Research Laboratory, University of Tennessee, Rockford, TN 37853

5. Department of Orthopaedics, Alpert Medical School, Brown University, Providence, RI 02912; Rhode Island Hospital, Providence, RI 02903

6. Simbex, Lebanon, NH 03766; Thayer School of Engineering at Dartmouth, Hanover, NH 03755

Abstract

The performance characteristics of football helmets are currently evaluated by simulating head impacts in the laboratory using a linear drop test method. To encourage development of helmets designed to protect against concussion, the National Operating Committee for Standards in Athletic Equipment recently proposed a new headgear testing methodology with the goal of more closely simulating in vivo head impacts. This proposed test methodology involves an impactor striking a helmeted headform, which is attached to a nonrigid neck. The purpose of the present study was to compare headform accelerations recorded according to the current (n=30) and proposed (n=54) laboratory test methodologies to head accelerations recorded in the field during play. In-helmet systems of six single-axis accelerometers were worn by the Dartmouth College men’s football team during the 2005 and 2006 seasons (n=20,733 impacts; 40 players). The impulse response characteristics of a subset of laboratory test impacts (n=27) were compared with the impulse response characteristics of a matched sample of in vivo head accelerations (n=24). Second- and third-order underdamped, conventional, continuous-time process models were developed for each impact. These models were used to characterize the linear head/headform accelerations for each impact based on frequency domain parameters. Headform linear accelerations generated according to the proposed test method were less similar to in vivo head accelerations than headform accelerations generated by the current linear drop test method. The nonrigid neck currently utilized was not developed to simulate sport-related direct head impacts and appears to be a source of the discrepancy between frequency characteristics of in vivo and laboratory head/headform accelerations. In vivo impacts occurred 37% more frequently on helmet regions, which are tested in the proposed standard than on helmet regions tested currently. This increase was largely due to the addition of the facemask test location. For the proposed standard, impactor velocities as high as 10.5 m/s were needed to simulate the highest energy impacts recorded in vivo. The knowledge gained from this study may provide the basis for improving sports headgear test apparatuses with regard to mimicking in vivo linear head accelerations. Specifically, increasing the stiffness of the neck is recommended. In addition, this study may provide a basis for selecting appropriate test impact energies for the standard performance specification to accompany the proposed standard linear impactor test method.

Publisher

ASME International

Subject

Physiology (medical),Biomedical Engineering

Reference38 articles.

1. Fatalities From Head and Cervical Spine Injuries Occurring in Tackle Football: 50 Years’ Experience;Mueller;Clin. Sports Med.

2. NOCSAE, 2007, “Standard Drop Test Method and Equipment Used in Evaluating the Performance Characteristics of Protective Headgear,” Paper No. 001-06m07.

3. Quantitative Determination of Acceleration and Intracranial Pressure in Experimental Head Injury;Gurdjian;Neurology

4. Observations on the Mechanism of Brain Concussion, Contusion, and Laceration;Gurdjian;Surg. Gynecol. Obstet.

5. Tolerance Curves of Acceleration and Intracranial Pressure and Protective Index in Experimental Head Injury;Gurdjian;J. Trauma

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3