DPIV Measurements of Flow Disturbances in Stented Artery Models: Adverse affects of Compliance Mismatch
Author:
Yazdani Saami K.1, Moore, James E.2, Berry Joel L.1, Vlachos Pavlos P.3
Affiliation:
1. Department of Biomedical Engineering, Wake Forest University, Medical Center Blvd., Winston-Salem, NC 27157-1022 2. Biomedical Engineering Department, Texas A&M University, Zachry Engineering Center 234E, 3210 TAMU, College Station, TX 77843-3120 3. Department of Mechanical Engineering, School of Biomedical Engineering, Virginia Tech, 114 Randolph Hall, Blacksburg, VA 24061
Abstract
Vascular stents influence the post-procedural hemodynamic environment in ways that may encourage restenosis. Understanding how stents influence flow patterns may lead to more hemodynamically compatible stent designs that alleviate thrombus formation and promote endothelialization. This study employed time-resolved Digital Particle Image Velocimetry (DPIV) to compare the hemodynamic performance of two stents in a compliant vessel. The first stent was a rigid insert, representing an extreme compliance mismatch. The second stent was a commercially available nitinol stent with some flexural characteristics. DPIV showed that compliance mismatch promotes the formation of a ring vortex in the vicinity of the stent. Larger compliance mismatch increased both the size and residence time of the ring vortex, and introduced in-flow stagnation points. These results provide detailed quantitative evidence of the hemodynamic effect of stent mechanical properties. Better understanding of these characteristics will provide valuable information for modifying stent design in order to promote long-term patency.
Publisher
ASME International
Subject
Physiology (medical),Biomedical Engineering
Reference22 articles.
1. Babapulle, M. N., and Eisenberg, M. J., 2002, “Coated Stents for the Prevention of Restenosis: Part II,” Circulation, 106, pp. 2800-5. 2. Berry, J. L., Moore, J. E., Newman, V. S., and Routh, W. D., 1997, “In vitro flow visualization in stented arterial segments,” J. Vasc. Invest., 3, pp. 63–68. 3. Rachev, A., Manoach, E., Berry, J. L., and Moore, J. E., 2000, “Model of Stress Induced Remodeling of Vessel Segments Adjacent to Stents and Artery/Graft Anastomoses,” J. Theor. Biol., 206(3), pp. 429–443. 4. Rolland, P. H., Charifi, A-B., Verrier, C., Bodard, H., Friggi, A., Piquet, P., Moulin, G., and Bartoli, J-M., 1999, “Hemodynamics and Wall Mechanics After Stent Placement in Swine Iliac Arteries: Comparative Results From Six Stent Designs,” Radiology, 213, pp. 229–246. 5. Berry, J. L., Santamarina, A., Moore., J. E., Roychowdhury, S., and Routh, W. D., 2000, “Experimental and Computational Flow Evaluation of Coronary Stents,” Ann. Biomed. Eng., 28, pp. 386–398.
Cited by
21 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|