Data-Driven Lossy Tube-Load Modeling of Arterial Tree: In-Human Study

Author:

Abdollahzade Majid1,Kim Chang-Sei1,Fazeli Nima1,Finegan Barry A.2,Sean McMurtry M.3,Hahn Jin-Oh4

Affiliation:

1. Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Maryland, 2107B Glenn L. Martin Hall, College Park, MD 20742 e-mail:

2. Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of Alberta, 8120 Clinical Sciences Building, Edmonton, AB T6G 2R3, Canada e-mail:

3. Department of Medicine (Cardiology), University of Alberta, 2C2 Walter Mackenzie Centre, Edmonton, AB T6G 2R3, Canada e-mail:

4. Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Maryland, 2104C Glenn L. Martin Hall, College Park, MD 20742 e-mail:

Abstract

In this paper, we present and validate a data-driven method to lossy tube-load modeling of arterial tree in humans. In the proposed method, the lossy tube-load model is fitted to central aortic and peripheral blood pressure (BP) waves in the time domain. For this purpose, we employ a time-domain lossy tube-load model in which the wave propagation constant is formulated to two terms: one responsible for the alteration of wave amplitude and the other for the transport delay. Using the experimental BP data collected from 17 cardiac surgery patients, we showed that the time-domain lossy tube-load model is able to accurately represent the relation between central aortic versus upper-limb and lower-limb BP waves. In addition, the comparison of lossy versus lossless tube-load models revealed that (1) the former outperformed the latter in general with the root-mean-squared errors (RMSE) of 3.1 mm Hg versus 3.5 mm Hg, respectively (p-value < 0.05), and (2) the efficacy of the former over the latter was more clearly observed in case the normalized difference in the mean central aortic versus peripheral BP was large; when the difference was >5% of the underlying mean BP, lossy and lossless models showed the RMSE of 2.7 mm Hg and 3.7 mm Hg, respectively (p-value < 0.05).

Publisher

ASME International

Subject

Physiology (medical),Biomedical Engineering

Reference40 articles.

1. Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics—2012 Update: A Report From the American Heart Association;Circulation,2012

2. Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics—2011 Update: A Report From the American Heart Association;Circulation,2011

3. Value of Primordial and Primary Prevention for Cardiovascular Disease: A Policy Statement From the American Heart Association;Circulation,2011

4. Central Pressure More Strongly Relates to Vascular Disease and Outcome Than Does Brachial Pressure: the Strong Heart Study;Hypertension,2007

5. Relations of Central and Brachial Blood Pressure to Left Ventricular Hypertrophy and Geometry: The Strong Heart Study;J. Hypertens.,2010

Cited by 11 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3