1. Atkinson
J. D.
, and ForrestJ. E., 1985, “Factors Influencing the Rate of Growth of Fatigue Cracks in RPV Steels Exposed to a Simulated PWR Primary Water Environment,” Corrosion Science, Vol. 25, No. 8/9, pp. 607–631.
2. Combrade, P., Foucault, M., and Slama, G., 1988, “Effect of Sulfur on the Fatigue Crack Growth Rates of Pressure Vessel Steel Exposed to PWR Coolant: Preliminary Model for Prediction of the Transitions Between High and Low Crack Growth Rates,” Proceedings, Third International Conference, Environmental Degradation of Materials in Nuclear Power Systems—Water Reactors, G. J. Theus and J. R. Weeks, eds., TMS-AIME, pp. 269–276.
3. Eason
E. D.
, AndrewS. P., WarmbrodtS. B., NelsonE. E., and GilmanJ. D., 1989, “Analysis of Pressure Vessel Steel Fatigue Tests in Air,” Nuclear Engineering and Design, Vol. 115, No. 1, pp. 23–30.
4. Gabetta, G., and Caretta, E., 1987, “Corrosion-Potential Measurements Inside and Outside a Growing Crack During Environmental Fatigue Tests at 288°C, with Different Oxygen Contents,” Corrosion Chemistry Within Pits, Crevices and Cracks, Her Majesty’s Stationery Office, London, U.K., pp. 287–300.
5. Hartt, W. H., Tennant, J. S., and Hooper, W. C., 1978, “Solution Chemistry Modification Within Corrosion-Fatigue Cracks,” Corrosion-Fatigue Technology, ASTM STP 642, pp. 5–18.