A Comparison of Squat Depth and Sex on Knee Kinematics and Muscle Activation

Author:

Barrett Kiara B.1,Sievert Zachary A.1,Bennett Hunter J.1

Affiliation:

1. Neuromechanics Lab, Department of Human Movement Sciences, Old Dominion University, Norfolk, VA 23526

Abstract

Abstract The squat is an essential exercise for strengthening lower body musculature. Although squats are frequently employed to improve lower extremity strength and neuromuscular control, differences between sexes and slight modifications, such as squat depth, can dramatically alter muscle recruitment and thus the foci of the exercise. The purpose of this study was to assess the effect of sex and squat depth on lower extremity coactivation and kinematics. Twenty recreationally active (female = 10) participants were recruited. The first visit consisted of one repetition maximum testing. For the second visit, muscle activation was recorded of the gluteus maximus (GM), semitendinosus, biceps femoris (BF), vastus medialis, vastus lateralis, rectus femoris, and gastrocnemius. Reflective markers were placed on the lower body for three-dimensional motion capture. Participants performed a series of squats to 90 deg knee flexion and 120 deg knee flexion. Benjamin–Hochberg procedure was employed and the alpha level was set at 0.05. Knee flexion (p < 0.001), adduction (p < 0.001), and external rotation (p = 0.008) were reduced during 90 deg compared to deep squats. Hip flexion, abduction, and external rotation were greater in deep squats (p < 0.001). Males had greater hip extensor to quad (HE:Q) cocontraction in 90 deg compared to deep squats (p = 0.007); females produced greater posterior chain activation in deep squats (p = 0.001) on ascent. When comparing sexes, males displayed greater HE:Q in the 90 deg squat during ascent (p = 0.013). The addition of deep squats into a preventative training program could be beneficial in reducing deficits prevalent in females and decrease injury incidence.

Publisher

ASME International

Subject

Physiology (medical),Biomedical Engineering

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3