Correlation Between LDA and Ultrasound Heart Catheter Measurements in a Stenosed Arterial Model
Author:
Liepsch D.1, Poll A.1, Blasini R.2
Affiliation:
1. Fachhochschule and Technical University, Munich, Lothstr 34, 80335 Munich, Germany 2. Klinikum rechts der Isar der Technical Universitat Munchen, Ismaninger Str. 22, 81657 Munich, Germany
Abstract
Ultrasound heart catheters are used to measure the velocity in coronary arteries. However, the act of introducing a catheter into the vessel disturbs the very flow being measured. We used laser Doppler anemometry to measure the velocity distribution in an axially symmetric model, both with and without a catheter inserted. The catheter reduced the center-line velocity by as much as 60 percent at a distance of 2 mm downstream from the catheter, and by as much as 25 percent at a distance of 10 mm. This means the velocity measured with an ultrasound catheter does not show the maximum velocity of the undisturbed flow in the tube center. In the constriction, however, the measured velocities with the LDA and ultrasound catheter are almost the same. Thus, catheter measurements in the stenosis achieve accurate results. The velocity profile in the stenosed areas is flattened over nearly the whole cross section. The velocity is extremely reduced only close to the wall. The measurements outside of the stenosis lead to large differences which need to be studied carefully in the future. The disturbed flow finally disappeared 15 mm downstream of the catheter. The measurements were done at steady flow using a glycerine water solution with a dynamic viscosity of 4.35m Pas. In future studies, these experiments will be repeated for pulsatile flow conditions using non-Newtonian blood-like fluids.
Publisher
ASME International
Subject
Physiology (medical),Biomedical Engineering
Reference17 articles.
1. Durst, F., Melling, A., Whitelaw, J. H., Principles and Practice of Laser-Doppler-Anemometry, Academic Press, London, 1976. 2. Ginn
A. L.
, WhiteC. W., and WilsonR. F., “Interstudy variability of Coronary Flow Reserve. Influence of Heart Rate, Arterial Pressure and Ventricular Preload,” Circulation, Vol. 81, 1990, pp. 1319–1330. 3. Hartley
C. J.
, “Review of Intracoronary Doppler Catheter,” Int. J. Card. Imaging, Vol. 4, 1980, pp. 159–168. 4. Johnson
E. L.
, YockP. G., HargraveV. K., SrebroJ. P., ManubensS. M., SeitzW., and PortsT. A., “Assessment of Severity of Coronary Stenoses Using a Doppler Catheter. Validation of a Method Based on the Continuity Equation,” Circulation, Vol. 80, 1989, pp. 625–635. 5. Kajiya, F., Ogasawara, Y., Kamazawa, S., Matsuoka, S., Hiramatsu, O., Tsujioka, K., and Kufiwara, T., “Normal and Stenotic Blood Flow Velocities in Human Left Coronary Artery Measured by an 80-Channel 20 MHz Pulsed Doppler Velocimeter,” Biofluid Mechanics—Blood Flow in Large Vessels, D. Liepsch, ed., Berlin, Springer, 1990, pp. 147–154.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|