Affiliation:
1. Institute of Aeroelasticity, DLR, Go¨ttingen, Germany
Abstract
The aeroelastic behavior of vibrating blade assemblies is usually investigated in the frequency domain where the determination of aeroelastic stability boundaries is separated from the computation of linearized unsteady aerodynamic forces. However, nonlinear fluid-structure interaction caused by oscillating shocks or strong flow separation may significantly influence the aerodynamic damping and hence effect a shift of stability boundaries. In order to investigate such aeroelastic phenomena, the governing equations of structural and fluid motion have to be simultaneously integrated in time. In this paper a technique is presented which analyzes the aeroelastic behavior of an oscillating compressor cascade in the time domain. The structural part of the governing aeroelastic equations is time-integrated according to the algorithm of Newmark, while the unsteady airloads are computed at every time step by an Euler upwind code. The link between the two time integrations is an automatic grid generation in which the used mesh is dynamically deformed as such that it conforms with the deflected blades at every time step. The computed time series of the aeroelastic simulation of an assembly of twenty compressor blades performing torsional vibrations in transonic flow are presented. For subsonic flow, the differences between time domain and frequency domain results are of negligible order. For transonic flow, however, where vibrating shocks and a temporarily choked flow in the blade channel dominate the unsteady flow, the energy transfer between fluid and structure is no longer comparable to that of a linear system. It is demonstrated that the application of the time domain method leads to a significantly different aeroelastic behavior of the blade assembly including a shift of the stability boundary.
Reference25 articles.
1. Platzer, M. F., and Carta, F. O., 1987/1988, “Aeroelasticity in Axial-Flow Turbomachines, Vol. 1: Unsteady Turbomachinery Aerodynamics. Vol. 2: Structural Dynamics and Aeroelasticity AGARD,” AGARDograph 298.
2. Kaza, K. R. V., and Kielb, R. E., 1982, “Flutter and Response of a Mistuned Cascade in Incompressible Flow,” AIAA J., 20, No. 8, pp. 1120–1127.
3. Bendiksen, O. O. , 1984, “Flutter of Mistuned Turbomachinery Rotors,” ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power, 106, pp. 25–33.
4. Crawley, E. F., and Hall, K. C., 1985, “Optimization and Mechanisms of Mistuning in Cascades,” ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power, 107, pp. 418–426.
5. Bloemhof, H. , 1988, Flutter of Blade Rows With Mistuning and Structural Coupling, Report No. 14, DGM-LTT, EPF-Lausanne.
Cited by
21 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献