Integration of Process Simulation in Machining Parameter Optimization
Author:
Stori J. A.1, Wright P. K.2, King C.3
Affiliation:
1. Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL 61801 2. Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA 94720 3. Integrated Manufacturing Systems Center, Sandia National Laboratories, Livermore, CA 94551
Abstract
In recent years, simulation tools have proven valuable for the prediction of machining state variables over a wide range of operating parameters. Such simulation packages, however, are seldom an integral part of machining parameter optimization modules. This paper proposes a methodology for incorporating simulation feedback to fine-tune analytic models during the optimization process. Through a limited number of calls to the computationally expensive simulation tools, process parameters may be generated that satisfy the design constraints within the accuracy of the simulation predictions, while providing an efficient balance among parameters arising from the functional form of the optimization model. The following iterative algorithm is presented: (i) a non-linear programming (NLP) optimization technique is used to select process parameters based on closed-form analytical constraint equations relating to critical design requirements, (ii) the simulation is executed using these process parameters, providing predictions of the critical state variables. (iii) Constraint equation parameters are dynamically adapted using the feedback provided by the simulation predictions. This sequence is repeated until local convergence between the simulation and constraint equation predictions has been achieved. A case study in machining parameter optimization for peripheral finish milling operations is developed in which constraints on the allowable form error,Δ and the peripheral surface roughness, Ra, drive the process parameter selection for a cutting operation intended to maximize the material removal rate. Results from twenty machining scenarios are presented, including five workpiece/tool material combinations at four levels of precision. Achieving agreement (within a 5% deviation tolerance) between the simulation and constraint equation predictions required an average of 5 simulation execution cycles (maximum of 8), demonstrating promise that simulation tools can be efficiently incorporated into parameter optimization processes.
Publisher
ASME International
Subject
Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering,Computer Science Applications,Mechanical Engineering,Control and Systems Engineering
Reference37 articles.
1. Taylor
F. W.
, “On the Art of Cutting Metals,” Transactions of the ASME, 28, 1907, 3131. 2. Wright, P. K., and Bourne, D. A., Manufacturing Intelligence, Addison-Wesley, 1988. 3. Chen, Y. Y., and Thompson, W., “A Survey of Expert Systems in Process Planning and Machining Operation Planning,” Trans. of the Institute of Eng., Australia, Mech. Eng., Vol. ME 16, No. 4, 1991. 4. Gupta, T., and Ghosh, B. K., “A Survey of Expert Systems in Manufacturing and Process Planning,” Computer in Industry, Nov. 1988, pp. 195–204. 5. Pham
D. T.
, and PhamP. T., “Expert Systems in Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering,” Int. V. Adv. Manuf. Tech., Vol. 3, No. 3, 1988, pp. 3–21.
Cited by
15 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|