Validation and Assessment of a Hybrid VOF-Lagrangian Numerical Methodology for Turbulent Liquid Fuel Jets in High-Speed Crossflow

Abstract

Abstract For gas turbine combustors, injecting liquid fuel in crossflow can achieve superior mixing characteristics to improve performance and reduce emissions. Robust numerical design tools are needed to accelerate the development of low-emissions technologies. Atomization modeling is often facilitated by using the Lagrangian approach rather than the more complex and computationally expensive Volume-of-Fluid (VOF) approach. However, most Lagrangian breakup models rely on empirical constants that must be fully calibrated for jets in crossflow and representative conditions. A hybrid approach could deliver a better compromise between accuracy and computational cost. This study proposes and validates a novel numerical methodology for coupling the VOF and Lagrangian approaches using a stochastic breakup model with Adaptive Mesh Refinements for turbulent liquid fuel jets in crossflow under more representative gas turbine conditions. The predictions were validated in the near and far-field regions using datasets at high pressures (1–8 bar), Weber numbers (720–1172), and momentum flux ratios (6–33). The predictive capabilities and computational cost were also compared to the Lagrangian approach coupled with large eddy simulations (LES) and with the unsteady Reynolds-Averaged Navier–Stokes (RANS) methodology previously developed and validated by the authors. The effect of different VOF-Lagrangian transition criteria on the computational cost was also assessed and recommendations were provided for further improvements. The overall LES predictions were significantly improved by the proposed hybrid methodology. Although it tends to underpredict the spray trajectory and Sauter Mean Diameter compared to the URANS methodology, it better captures the diameter in the wake region and the droplet velocities.