Assessment of the DDES-γ Model for the Simulation of a Highly Loaded Turbine Cascade

Author:

Fard Afshar Nima1,Möller Felix M.2,Henninger Stefan1,Kožulović Dragan3,Morsbach Christian4,Bechlars Patrick5,Jeschke Peter1

Affiliation:

1. RWTH University Institute of Jet Propulsion and Turbomachinery, , Aachen 52062 , Germany

2. German Aerospace Center (DLR) Institute of Test and Simulation for Gas Turbines, , Cologne 51147 , Germany

3. Bundeswehr University Institute of Jet Propulsion, Department of Aerospace Engineering, , Neubiberg D-85577 , Germany

4. German Aerospace Center (DLR) Institute of Propulsion Technology, Numerical Methods, , Cologne 51147 , Germany

5. MTU Aero Engines AG , Munich 80995 , Germany

Abstract

Abstract The flow over the linear low-pressure turbine cascade MTU-T161 at Re = 90,000 is analyzed using delayed detached eddy simulations (DDES). At this operating point, the low Reynolds number and the high loading of the blade result in a separation bubble and a separation-induced transition of the flow over the suction side. The utilized DDES method is based on a vorticity-based formulation to calculate the subgrid length scales, and it incorporates the one-equation γ-transition model. The computational model of the MTU-T161 cascade consists of one blade passage, including the diverging viscous sidewalls. To reproduce realistic operating conditions and to mimic the experiments, synthetic turbulence is prescribed at the inlet of the computational domain. Several studies are performed to assess the accuracy and performance of the DDES one-equation γ-transition model against experimental data and a benchmark large eddy simulations (LES). The primary focus is on the prediction of the separation and the separation-induced transition mechanism. First of all, a systematic grid convergence study is conducted and grid criteria are derived in order to ensure a satisfactory agreement of the flow metrics, such as isentropic Mach number, friction coefficient distribution, and total pressure wake losses at mid-span with experimental data. Furthermore, a detailed analysis of the DDES model parameters, such as shielding function and subgrid length scale, is presented and the effect of these parameters on the prediction accuracy of the separation bubble region is analyzed. The analysis of the suction side boundary layer indicates that the turbulent kinetic energy should be resolved and modeled properly in order to represent the separation bubble correctly. In particular, the correct prediction of the separated shear layer above the separation bubble is of utmost importance. The results of the simulations reveal higher demands on grid resolution for such transitional flows than typically have been reported in the literature for turbulent boundary layers. This higher demand on grid resolution results in more expensive simulations than Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes (RANS). Nevertheless, DDES requires less computing time than wall-resolved LES. Additionally, the results of the transitional DDES model are compared to DDES without a transition model, an RANS eddy viscosity model, and a reference LES. The results show that the DDES approach needs to be coupled with a transition model, such as the one-equation γ-transition model, in order to capture the flow topology over a highly loaded turbine blade correctly. The benefit of the DDES one-equation γ-transition model becomes particularly evident when predicting the separated shear layer, the transition process, and the subsequent reattachment. The RANS eddy viscosity turbulence and transition models applied within our study are not able to predict the aforementioned mechanisms accurately. For highly loaded turbine blades in particular, the accurate prediction of flow separation and potential reattachment is crucial for the aerodynamic design of turbines, since large parts of the total pressure loss are generated in the separated region. For this reason, the DDES one-equation γ-transition model can be a good compromise in terms of predictive accuracy and computational costs.

Publisher

ASME International

Subject

Mechanical Engineering

Reference37 articles.

1. Two-Equation Eddy-Viscosity Turbulence Models for Engineering Applications;Menter;AIAA J.,1994

2. Reassessment of the Scale-Determining Equation for Advanced Turbulence Models;Wilcox;AIAA J.,1988

3. Correlation-Based Transition Modeling for Unstructured Parallelized Computational Fluid Dynamics Codes;Langtry;AIAA J.,2009

4. Comments on the Feasability of LES for Wings, and on a Hybrid RANS/LES Approach;Spalart;Comput. Sci.,1997

5. Assessment of the IDDES Method Acting as Wall-Modeled LES in the Simulation of Spatially Developing Supersonic Flat Plate Boundary Layers;Han;Eng. Appl. Comput. Fluid Mech.,2018

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3