Application of a Novel Measure of In Vivo Knee Joint Laxity

Author:

Küpper J. C.1,Westover L.1,Frayne R.234,Ronsky J. L.5678

Affiliation:

1. Department of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB T2N 1N4, Canada

2. Department of Radiology,

3. Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB T2N 1N4, Canada;

4. Seaman Family Centre, Foothills Medical Centre, Alberta Health Services, Calgary, AB T2N 2T9, Canada

5. Professor Department of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering,

6. McCaig Centre for Joint Injury and Arthritis Research, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB T2N 1N4, Canada;

7. Department of Surgery, Faculties of Kinesiology and Medicine, Schulich School of Engineering, Calgary, AB T2N 1N4, Canada;

8. Zymetrix—BOSE Biomaterials & Tissue Engineering Technology Development Centre, 2500 University Drive NW, Calgary, AB T2N 1N4, Canada e-mail:

Abstract

Current measures of knee joint laxity, such as those found clinically using the KT-2000 arthrometer, are not highly repeatable or reliable by Huber et al. (1997, “Intratester and Intertester Reliability of the KT-1000 Arthrometer in the Assessment of Posterior Laxity of the Knee,” Am. J. Sports Med., 25(4), pp. 479–485). In this study, a noninvasive in vivo magnetic resonance (MR) imaging-based measure of laxity, the knee loading apparatus (KLA) with anterior positioning frame, was evaluated with five normal subjects (repeatability study, n = 3). Effects of hormones and muscle guarding were considered. When compared to the KT-2000, the KLA was found to be more precise (±0.33 mm versus ±1.17 mm) but less reliable (Cronbach's alpha > 0.70 in 0/8 versus 5/8 load levels). Improved control of the initial subject position is recommended for future design iterations. The KLA shows promise as an accurate and reliable tool for measuring in vivo joint and ligament laxity.

Publisher

ASME International

Subject

Physiology (medical),Biomedical Engineering

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3