Abstract
This research paper examines the International Political Economy (IPE) to explore how the adoption of systems thinking can foster resilient governance in an increasingly fragmented global landscape. It juxtaposes the linear philosophy predominant in Western thought with the nonlinear essence ingrained in Eastern philosophy, linking these paradigms to the qualitative and quantitative approaches that shape IPE. Through a comparative analysis of instruments for growth, linear-nonlinear feedback loops, and the interplay between trade policy and international relations dynamics, the paper argues for the convergence of top-down and bottom-up strategies in policymaking. By integrating these diverse perspectives, the argument endeavours to highlight the importance of reconciling disparate approaches to enhance the adaptability and efcacy of governance systems in a complex world.
Publisher
O P Jindal Global University
Reference14 articles.
1. Au, W. (2013). Hiding behind high-stakes testing: Meritocracy, objectivity and inequality in US education. International Education Journal: Comparative Perspectives, 12(2).
2. De Landa, M. (2021). A thousand years of nonlinear history. Princeton University Press.
3. Edquist, C. (2016). The Swedish National Innovation Council: Innovation policy governance to replace linearity with holism. Papers in Innovation Studies 24: 1-52.
4. Homsy, G. C., Liu, Z. & Warner, M.E. (2019). Multilevel governance: Framing the integration of top-down and bottom-up policymaking. International Journal of Public Administration 42(7): 572-582.
5. Jenkins, T. N. (2002). Chinese traditional thought and practice: lessons for an ecological economics worldview. Ecological Economics, 40(1), 39-52.