Author:
CALDARA ROBERTO,DESANČIĆ MILANA,GASSMANN ANDRE,LEGARRETA LORENZA,EMERSON BRENT C.,TOŠEVSKI IVO
Abstract
From examination of type specimens the authors establish that Rhinusa hispida sensu auctorum is not the same species as R. hispida (Brullé, 1832), which is instead synonymous with R. tetra (Fabricius, 1792) (syn. n.). Moreover, under the name R. hispida sensu auctorum two distinct taxa are confused, which can be distinguished from each other by taxonomic, biological and genetic differences: R. pilosa (Gyllenhal, 1838) and R. brondelii (Brisout, 1862), stat. n. (= R. lanuginosa (Wollaston, 1875), syn. n.). Gymnetron vulpes Lucas, 1849 (= G. marmota Fairmaire, 1883, syn. n.), previously placed under synonymy of R. hispida (Brullé), is transferred to the genus Mecinus and considered a distinct species. A neotype of G. pilosum brondelii Brisout and lectotypes of G. hispidum Brullé, G. pilosum Gyllenhal, G. vulpes Lucas and G. lanuginosum Wollaston are designated.
Subject
Animal Science and Zoology,Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
Cited by
13 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献