Abstract
A new species of the uropeltid (‘shieldtail’) snake genus Uropeltis is described based on eight specimens from the southern part of peninsular India’s Western Ghats. Uropeltis caudomaculata sp. nov. is phenotypically and genetically most similar to U. pulneyensis (Beddome, 1863), but differs primarily in having more ventral scales and in being restricted to the eastern escarpment of the Western Ghats between Meghamalai and approximately 15 km East of Munnar rather than in the Palani Hills, as well as differing in DNA nucleotide sequences. From verified records, we consider U. pulneyensis to be known thus far only from the Palani Hills, and we designate a lectotype for the species. Reconsideration of the holotype of Silybura guentheri Beddome, 1878 from Meghamalai leads us to conclude that it should be removed from the subjective junior synonymy of U. pulneyensis and be considered a distinct though very poorly known species, Uropeltis guentheri comb. nov.
Reference45 articles.
1. Areìvalo, E., Davis, S.K. & Sites, J.W. (1994) Mitochondrial DNA sequence divergence and phylogenetic relationships among eight chromosome races of the Sceloporus grammicus Complex (Phrynosomatidae) in Central Mexico. Systematic Biology, 43 (3), 387–418. https://doi.org/10.1093/sysbio/43.3.387
2. Beddome, R.H. (1878) Descriptions of new Uropeltidae from southern India, with remarks on some previously described species. Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London, 46, 154–155. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7998.1878.tb07946.x
3. Beddome, R.H. (1886) An account of the earth-snakes of the peninsula of India and Ceylon. Annals and Magazine of Natural History, Series 5, 17 (97), 3–33. https://doi.org/10.1080/00222938609460106
4. Beddome, R.H. (1863) Descriptions of new species of the family Uropeltidae from Southern India, with notes on other little-known species. Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London, 1863, 225–229.
5. Boettger, O. (1892) Listen von Kriechtieren und Lurchen aus dem tropischen Asien und aus Papuasien. Berichte über die Tätigkeit des Offenbacher Vereins für Naturkunde, 29–32, 65–164.