Integrity Assessment of Open-Circuit Respiration Chambers for Ruminant Animal Indirect Calorimetry

Author:

Li Jiangong,Green-Miller Angela R.,Shike Daniel W.

Abstract

Abstract. Open-circuit chambers have been widely applied to gas exchange measurement for indirect calorimetry and greenhouse gas emission. The reliability of these systems is crucial and is commonly evaluated through recovery tests. These tests simulate gas exchanges of animals through the injection or consumption of known quantities of gases, while monitoring the gas flux with the measurement system, and then comparing the difference between the known mass and the measured mass to assess the system integrity. Although the recovery test approach is widely accepted, the method of how to choose recovery tests has rarely been documented, and no single source has been found that summarizes a complete process for evaluating a system and correcting post-evaluation systematic errors. In this study, three recovery methods were applied: (1) the alcohol combustion method (ACM) burns a known amount of pure ethanol to simulate both consumption (O2) and production (CO2); (2) the gravimetric gas injection method (GRAV) directly measures the weight change of a compressed CO2 gas cylinder during the injection process; and (3) the constant gas injection method (CGIM) steadily injects sulfur hexafluoride (SF6) gas into the chamber. An experiment was conducted that included eight repeated trials for each of the three methods in six identical chambers (144 total tests) of the Ruminant Emission Measurement System (REMS) at the Beef Cattle and Sheep Field Laboratory at the University of Illinois in Urbana-Champaign. The recovery percentages of the respiratory quotient for the six ACM chambers varied from 72.58% to 77.76%, indicating that measurement and calculation errors occurred in the system. The CGIM and GRAV methods were used for identifying the errors from ventilation measurement and calculation of exhaust airflow rate. Correction factors were generated from the results and proved effective, as recovery percentages were improved to an acceptable level (100% ±5%) for all chambers. This approach can be applied to other studies and other systems to assist in selecting appropriate integrity tests and applying correction methods. Keywords: Cattle, Emissions, Gas exchange, Metabolism, Recovery method, Tracer gas measurement.

Funder

The Dudley Smith Foundation

Publisher

American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers (ASABE)

Subject

Soil Science,Agronomy and Crop Science,Biomedical Engineering,Food Science,Forestry

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3