EFFECTS OF FACE MASKS ON CARDIORESPIRATORY PARAMETERS DURING EXERCISE VELOERGOMETRY TEST
-
Published:2024-05-22
Issue:
Volume:2
Page:691-701
-
ISSN:2256-0629
-
Container-title:SOCIETY. INTEGRATION. EDUCATION. Proceedings of the International Scientific Conference
-
language:
-
Short-container-title:SIE
Author:
Ozols Edgars,Galeja Zinta,Kaupužs Aivars
Abstract
The COVID-19 pandemic has sparked ongoing scientific discussions about the adverse effects of wearing face masks on cardiorespiratory indicators, and the subjective response to exertion. Many researchers have investigated the impact of wearing face masks on different physiological factors through various exercise routines, such as a progressive cycling test, the 6-minute walk test, and treadmill walking at a constant pace, yielding inconsistent findings. This study aimed to examine the physiological and perceptual responses of wearing surgical face masks during and after the veloegometry test. Fifteen healthy young adults (mean age, 26.8±4.4 years, 5 males and 10 females) conducted the Astrand-Rhyming veloegometry protocol twice (with and without masks). Physiological outcomes (heart rate, maximal oxygen uptake, and oxygen saturation level), perceived exertion, and discomfort feeling by modified Borg scale were assessed. No significant differences were observed in physiological outcomes with or without masks during increasing load intensities (p > 0.05) except for the last minute of testing and the minute after testing (p ≤ 0.005). Participants wearing masks reported the tendency of higher exertion level (3.8±1.08 vs 4.4±0.9) but statistical analysis can't definitively confirm it. While exercising with a face mask may not adversely affect cardiorespiratory factors, it can elevate perceived exertion levels and discomfort, particularly when exercise intensity exceeds a certain threshold.
Publisher
Rezekne Academy of Technologies
Reference22 articles.
1. Bruce, R.A., Kusumi, F., & Hosmer, D. (1973). Maximal oxygen intake and nomographic assessment of functional aerobic impairment in cardiovascular disease. Am Heart J. Apr;85(4), 546-62. DOI: 10.1016/0002-8703(73)90502-4 2. Chandrasekaran, B., & Fernandes, S. (2020). “Exercise with facemask; Are we handling a devil's sword?”–A physiological hypothesis. Medical hypotheses, 144, 110002. doi: 10.1016/j.mehy.2020.110002 3. de Souza E Silva, C. G., Kaminsky, L. A., Arena, R., Christle, J. W., Araújo, C., Lima, R. M., Ashley, E. A., & Myers, J. (2018). A reference equation for maximal aerobic power for treadmill and cycle ergometer exercise testing: Analysis from the friend registry. European journal of preventive cardiology, 25(7), 742–750. DOI: 10.1177/2047487318763958 4. Driver, S., Reynolds, M., Brown, K., Vingren, J. L., Hill, D. W., Bennett, M., ... & Jones, A. (2022). Effects of wearing a cloth face mask on performance, physiological and perceptual responses during a graded treadmill running exercise test. British journal of sports medicine, 56(2), 107-113. DOI: 10.1136/bjsports-2020-103758 5. Epstein, D., Korytny, A., Isenberg, Y., Marcusohn, E., Zukermann, R., Bishop, B., Minha, S., Raz, A., & Miller, A. (2021). Return to training in the COVID-19 era: The physiological effects of face masks during exercise. Scandinavian journal of medicine & science in sports, 31(1), 70–75. DOI: 10.1111/sms.13832
|
|