LEGAL BOUNDARIES OF SOCIAL RELATIONS BETWEEN CIVIL SOCIETY AND JUDICIAL BODIES

Author:

Blikhar MariiaORCID,Jankal Radoslav

Abstract

The evaluation procedure of the judiciary in the modern conditions of the relationship between civil society and the rule of law occupies a key place because the modern conditions for the formation of such relationships emphasize the struggle for the rule of law and the independence of judges. Within the framework of the study, it was found that the relationship between civil society and the rule of law implements the established system of checks and balances in ensuring the balance of social relations (including the recognition of lawful behavior as a perceived necessity) in general and the protection of individuals from the arbitrariness of authorities in particular. Therefore, in this context, the influential importance of the judiciary is given its ability to fully protect the violated rights of the individual and the interests of the state within the framework of the legal field. At the same time, it is necessary to state that the state and civil society, within the limits of their mutual relations, have certain regulatory and control functions regarding the activities of the judiciary. In such a case, the relationship between the state and civil society within the framework of the evaluation procedure of the judiciary's activity should be interpreted as a system that performs specific functions in order to characterize the presence of interconnected elements with clearly defined forms of relationships. At most, these relationships contain a number of specific elements, among which are the following: subjects of interaction, objects of interaction, mutual relations between subjects, and changes caused by the interaction of subjects. It is substantiated that the key feature of the court within the framework of the relationship between civil society and the rule of law is primarily the independence of the court through the independence of judges. The definition of the concept of "independent judge" is proposed, according to which such a judge is a highly qualified specialist who in his practical activities acts exclusively on the basis of the law, making unbiased legal decisions, relying on the requirements of regulatory legal acts, regardless of possible benefit for himself. In turn, the relationship between civil society and judicial authorities has a direct impact on increasing the efficiency of court work through the establishment of the principle of the rule of law, helping to ensure the independence of judges on the one hand, and increasing the level of legal awareness and legal culture of the population on the other hand.

Publisher

FinTechAlliance

Reference25 articles.

1. Mesiuk, M. P. (2018). Vzaiemodiia instytutiv vlady ta hromadianskoho suspilstva v Ukraini v konteksti yevrointehratsiinykh protsesiv. Derzhavne upravlinnia, 87–93. http://www.investplan.com.ua/pdf/8_2018/20.pdf

2. Mochulska, M. (2018). Sudova vlada ta hromadskist: vzaiemodiia v umovakh konstytutsiinoi reformy pravosuddia v Ukraini. Ukrainskyi chasopys konstytutsiinoho prava, 3, 39–46. https://www.constjournal.com/wp-content/uploads/issues/2018-3/pdfs/3-martamochulska-sudova-vlada-hromadskist-vzaiemodiia-umovakh-konstytutsiinoi-reformy-pravosuddia.pdf

3. Nalyvaiko, L. R., & Oliinyk, V. M. ( 2019). Teoretyko-pravova kharakterystyka vzaiemodii orhaniv sudovoi vlady ta instytutiv hromadianskoho suspilstva: monohrafiia. Dnipro: DDUVS, 192. http://er.dduvs.in.ua/handle/123456789/3890

4. Fatkhutdinov, V. H. (2018). Poniattia subiektiv, obiektiv ta zmistu administratyvno-pravovykh vidnosyn u sferi hromadskoi bezpeky. Derzhava ta rehiony. Seriia: Pravo, 1(59), 127–132. http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/drp_2018_1_23

5. Dniprov, O. (2021). Interaction of executive authorities and public institutions: administrative and legal aspect. Entrepreneurship, economy and law, 4, 138–143. http://pgp-journal.kiev.ua/archive/2021/4/21.pdf

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3