Author:
Pfistermeister Barbara,Sedlmayr Brita,Patapovas Andrius,Suttner Gerald,Tektas Ozan,Tarkhov Aleksey,Kornhuber Johannes,Fromm Martin,Bürkle Thomas,Prokosch Hans-Ulrich,Maas Renke
Abstract
Summary
Background: A well-known problem in current clinical decision support systems (CDSS) is the high number of alerts, which are often medically incorrect or irrelevant. This may lead to the so-called alert fatigue, an over -riding of alerts, including those that are clinically relevant, and underuse of CDSS in general.
Objectives: The aim of our study was to develop and to apply a standardized tool that allows its users to evaluate the quality of system-generated drug alerts. The users’ ratings can subsequently be used to derive recommendations for developing a filter function to reduce irrelevant alerts.
Methods: We developed a rating tool for drug alerts and performed a web-based evaluation study that also included a user review of alerts. In this study the following categories were evaluated: “data linked correctly”, “medically correct”, “action required”, “medication change”, “critical alert”, “information gained” and “show again”. For this purpose, 20 anonymized clinical cases were randomly selected and displayed in our customized CDSS research prototype, which used the summary of product characteristics (SPC) for alert generation. All the alerts that were provided were evaluated by 13 physicians. The users’ ratings were used to derive a filtering algorithm to reduce overalerting.
Results: In total, our CDSS research prototype generated 399 alerts. In 98 % of all alerts, medication data were rated as linked correctly to drug information; in 93 %, the alerts were assessed as “medically correct”; 19.5 % of all alerts were rated as “show again”. The interrater-agreement was, on average, 68.4 %. After the application of our filtering algorithm, the rate of alerts that should be shown again decreased to 14.8 %.
Conclusions: The new standardized rating tool supports a standardized feedback of user-perceived clinical relevance of CDSS alerts. Overall, the results indicated that physicians may consider the majority of alerts formally correct but clinically irrelevant and override them. Filtering may help to reduce overalerting and increase the specificity of a CDSS.
Funder
German Federal Ministry of Education and Research
Subject
Health Information Management,Advanced and Specialised Nursing,Health Informatics
Reference40 articles.
1. Incidence of Adverse Drug Reactions in Hospitalized Patients
2. Incidence of fatal adverse drug reactions: a population based study
3. WHO. Medicines: safety of medicines - adverse drug reactions. Fact sheet N°293 2008. Available from: http://www.wiredhealthresources.net/resources/NA/WHO-FS_MedicinesSafetyAdverse Reactions.pdf
4. Schnurrer JU, Frölich JC. [Incidence and prevention of lethal undesirable drug effects]. Internist (Berl). 2003; 44(7): 889 - 895. German
5. Schrappe M, Lessing C, Albers B. Agenda Patientensicherheit 2007. 2008. Available from: http://www.aps-ev.de/fileadmin/fuerRedakteur/PDFs/Agenda_Patientensicherheit/Agenda_2007_ mit_Titelblatt.pdf
Cited by
8 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献