Development of a Standardized Rating Tool for Drug Alerts to Reduce Information Overload

Author:

Pfistermeister Barbara,Sedlmayr Brita,Patapovas Andrius,Suttner Gerald,Tektas Ozan,Tarkhov Aleksey,Kornhuber Johannes,Fromm Martin,Bürkle Thomas,Prokosch Hans-Ulrich,Maas Renke

Abstract

Summary Background: A well-known problem in current clinical decision support systems (CDSS) is the high number of alerts, which are often medically incorrect or irrelevant. This may lead to the so-called alert fatigue, an over -riding of alerts, including those that are clinically relevant, and underuse of CDSS in general. Objectives: The aim of our study was to develop and to apply a standardized tool that allows its users to evaluate the quality of system-generated drug alerts. The users’ ratings can subsequently be used to derive recommendations for developing a filter function to reduce irrelevant alerts. Methods: We developed a rating tool for drug alerts and performed a web-based evaluation study that also included a user review of alerts. In this study the following categories were evaluated: “data linked correctly”, “medically correct”, “action required”, “medication change”, “critical alert”, “information gained” and “show again”. For this purpose, 20 anonymized clinical cases were randomly selected and displayed in our customized CDSS research prototype, which used the summary of product characteristics (SPC) for alert generation. All the alerts that were provided were evaluated by 13 physicians. The users’ ratings were used to derive a filtering algorithm to reduce overalerting. Results: In total, our CDSS research prototype generated 399 alerts. In 98 % of all alerts, medication data were rated as linked correctly to drug information; in 93 %, the alerts were assessed as “medically correct”; 19.5 % of all alerts were rated as “show again”. The interrater-agreement was, on average, 68.4 %. After the application of our filtering algorithm, the rate of alerts that should be shown again decreased to 14.8 %. Conclusions: The new standardized rating tool supports a standardized feedback of user-perceived clinical relevance of CDSS alerts. Overall, the results indicated that physicians may consider the majority of alerts formally correct but clinically irrelevant and override them. Filtering may help to reduce overalerting and increase the specificity of a CDSS.

Funder

German Federal Ministry of Education and Research

Publisher

Georg Thieme Verlag KG

Subject

Health Information Management,Advanced and Specialised Nursing,Health Informatics

Reference40 articles.

1. Incidence of Adverse Drug Reactions in Hospitalized Patients

2. Incidence of fatal adverse drug reactions: a population based study

3. WHO. Medicines: safety of medicines - adverse drug reactions. Fact sheet N°293 2008. Available from: http://www.wiredhealthresources.net/resources/NA/WHO-FS_MedicinesSafetyAdverse Reactions.pdf

4. Schnurrer JU, Frölich JC. [Incidence and prevention of lethal undesirable drug effects]. Internist (Berl). 2003; 44(7): 889 - 895. German

5. Schrappe M, Lessing C, Albers B. Agenda Patientensicherheit 2007. 2008. Available from: http://www.aps-ev.de/fileadmin/fuerRedakteur/PDFs/Agenda_Patientensicherheit/Agenda_2007_ mit_Titelblatt.pdf

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3