Identifying Complementary and Alternative Medicine Usage Information from Internet Resources

Author:

Sharma Vivekanand,Holmes John,Sarkar Indra

Abstract

SummaryObjectives: Identify and highlight research issues and methods used in studying Complementary and Alternative Medicine (CAM) information needs, access, and exchange over the Internet.Methods: A literature search was conducted using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines from PubMed to identify articles that have studied Internet use in the CAM context. Additional searches were conducted at Nature.com and Google Scholar.Results: The Internet provides a major medium for attaining CAM information and can also serve as an avenue for conducting CAM related surveys. Based on the literature analyzed in this review, there seems to be significant interest in developing methodologies for identifying CAM treatments, including the analysis of search query data and social media platform discussions. Several studies have also underscored the challenges in developing approaches for identifying the reliability of CAM-related information on the Internet, which may not be supported with reliable sources. The overall findings of this review suggest that there are opportunities for developing approaches for making available accurate information and developing ways to restrict the spread and sale of potentially harmful CAM products and information.Conclusions: Advances in Internet research are yet to be used in context of understanding CAM prevalence and perspectives. Such approaches may provide valuable insights into the current trends and needs in context of CAM use and spread.

Funder

National Library of Medicine

Publisher

Georg Thieme Verlag KG

Subject

Health Information Management,Advanced and Specialized Nursing,Health Informatics

Reference139 articles.

1. Internet User Over Time: Pew Research Center; [cited 2015 Feb 4]. Available from: http://www.pewinternet.org/data-trend/internet-use/internet-use-over-time/

2. Social Media Use Over Time: Pew Research Center; [cited 2015 Feb 4]. Available from: http://www.pewinternet.org/data-trend/social-media/social-media-use-all-users/

3. Fox S, Duggan, M. Health Online 2013: Pew Internet & American Life Project; 2013 [updated Feb 4, 2015]. Available from: http://www.pewinternet.org/2013/01/15/health-online-2013/

4. Goldstein MS. The persistence and resurgence of medical pluralism. J Health Polit Policy Law. 2004; 29(4-5): 925-45; discussion 1005-19

5. Doctor in the house: the Internet as a source of lay health knowledge and the challenge to expertise

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3