A COMPARATIVE STUDY ON PRECISION METROLOGY SYSTEMS FOR ADDITIVE MANUFACTURING
Author:
SAĞBAŞ Binnur1ORCID, POYRAZ Özgür2ORCID, DURAKBASA Numan3ORCID
Affiliation:
1. YILDIZ TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY, FACULTY OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERING, DEPARTMENT OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERING 2. Eskişehir Teknik Üniversitesi 3. Vienna University of Technology
Abstract
This paper presents a comparative study on precision metrology systems such as Coordinate Measuring Machine (CMM), 3-Dimensional Scanning (3DS) and Computed Tomography (CT) for polymer additive manufacturing. A special test sample was designed and manufactured by Fused Deposition Modeling (FDM) and Selective Laser Sintering (SLS) AM systems. The manufactured parts were then measured by three different precision metrology systems and the results were compared in terms of different measurement and AM methods. Uncertainty analyses were conducted based on the results of CMM measurements. The benchmark highlighted the difference between part characteristics manufactured by FDM and SLS, where FDM part represented higher surface roughness and more deviation to the nominal design. Furthermore, expanded uncertainties computed for the FDM manufactured part were almost three times of the uncertainties computed for the SLS manufactured part. It was also demonstrated that one of the major contributors to the expanded uncertainty occurred because of rougher surface of FDM manufactured part. Similar tendency of part to nominal deviations were observable in all metrology systems including CMM, CT and 3DS. Findings of the study revealed the need of standardized measurement for inspection and control of AM parts.
Publisher
International Journal of 3D Printing Technologies and Digital Industry
Subject
Marketing,Economics and Econometrics,General Materials Science,General Chemical Engineering
Reference25 articles.
1. 1. Razavi, S. M. J., Bordonaro, G. G., Ferro, P., Torgersen, J., Berto, F., “Porosity effect on tensile behavior of Ti-6Al-4V specimens produced by laser engineered net shaping technology”, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part C: Journal of Mechanical Engineering Science, Vol. 235, Issue 10, Pages 1930-1937, 2018.
2. ISO/ASTM52900-15., “Standard Terminology for Additive Manufacturing – General Principles – Terminology”, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2015. 2. 3. Gibson, I., Rosen, D. W., Stucker, B., Khorasani, M., Rosen, D., Stucker, B., Khorasani, M., “Additive manufacturing technologies”, Springer, Vol. 17. Cham, Switzerland, 2021. 3. 4. Wang, X., Jiang, M., Zhou, Z., Gou, J., Hui, D., “3D printing of polymer matrix composites: A review and prospective”, Composites Part B: Engineering, Vol. 110, Pages 442-458, 2017. 4. 5. Singh, R., Garg, H. K., “Fused deposition modeling–a state of art review and future applications”, Reference Module in Materials Science and Materials Engineering, Pages 1-20, 2016. 5. 6. Sagbas, B., Boyacı, T. H., Durakbasa, N. M., “Precision metrology for additive manufacturing”, In The International Symposium for Production Research, Springer, Cham, Pages 324-332, 2019.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|