Abstract
"The General Framework Agreement for Peace in Bosnia and Herzegovina was conceived with one main purpose, creating a stable, democratic and safe multi ethnic BiH for all its citizens. In order to understand why this objective was not achieved more than 25 years after its implementation, it is important to analyze two main factors: the instruments used in the peace building process and the way they were implemented. The main purpose of this article is looking at certain instruments of peace building used in BiH, which were inefficiently implemented so it further amplified the ethnic aspects instead of alleviating them. In this case, the peace building instruments that will be analyzed are the governmental structure, the election process and its implementation in post-war BiH, and finally, aspects related to human rights such as refugee return and the development of the civil society. Keywords: Bosnia and Herzegovina, peace building, instruments, implementation, ethnicization. "
Reference12 articles.
1. "1. Bochsler, Daniel, "Non-discriminatory rules and ethnic representation: The election of the Bosnian state presidency", in Ethnopolitics, 2012.
2. 2. Bosnia and Herzegovina: Human Development Report. Millennium Development Goals, 2003, p. 26. [https://www.undp.org/sites/g/files/ zskgke326/files/publications/NHDR%20on%20MDGs%20eng%202003.pdf], 14.04.2021.
3. 3. Dahlman, Carl, and Ó. Tuathail Gearóid. ""Broken Bosnia: The localized geopolitics of displacement and return in two Bosnian places"", Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 2005.
4. 4. Hulsey J. W. "Why did they vote for those guys again?" Challenges and contradictions in the promotion of political moderation in post-war Bosnia and Herzegovina, Democratization, 2010.
5. 5. O'Brien, James C. "The Dayton constitution of Bosnia and Herzegovina", in Laurel E. Miller and Louis Aucoin (ed.), framing the state in times of transition, Washington, DC, 2010.