Abstract
"“The Intermediary” in the Philosophy of Space: Precariousness, Creation, Freedom. The reflection proposed by this text is the result of a dialogue spread over several years between philosophers and geographers. The best common ground between each other – in the right middle of the road – is undoubtedly the concept of the “intermediary”, which describes, negatively or affirmatively, the future of our physical, social, conceptual spaces and which speaks to us about discontinuity, hybridization, flow, contiguity, but also vulnerability, counterpowers and freedom. We wanted to show that far from being a concept of the residual, the unassimilable, the incomprehensible or even the irrational, the intermediary is the place of hospitality, the open work of alternative creativity, resistance, or affirmation of those who, excluded from dominant discourses, claim a right to speak and freely participate in social life. Keywords: Public space, social space, precariousness, intermediary, hybridization, resistance, creation. "
Reference11 articles.
1. "1. Hannah ARENDT, La condition de l'homme moderne, Calmann Lévy, Paris, 2018.
2. 2. Marc AUGE, Non-Lieux. Introduction à une anthropologie de la surmodernité, Seuil, Paris, 1992.
3. 3. Emmanuelle BONNERANDI, Pierre-Antoine LANDEL, Emmanuel Roux, « Les espaces intermédiaires, forme hybride : ville en campagne, campagne en ville ? », in Revue de Géographie Alpine / Journal of Alpine Research, Association pour la diffusion de la recherche alpine, 91/2003.
4. 4. Emmanuelle BONERANDI, Hélène ROTH, « Pour une géographie des espaces anti-héros : au-delà de la banalité des espaces intermédiaires », Jun 2007, Grenoble-Chambéry, France. ffhalshs-00704652, consulté en ligne le 20 novembre 2022,
5. 5. https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-00704652