Epistemological Questions for a Psychology of Dialogue-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Epistemological Questions for a Psychology of Dialogue

Published:2022-12-06 Issue:3 Volume:67 Page:11-24
ISSN:2065-9407
Container-title:Studia Universitatis Babeș-Bolyai Philosophia
language:
Short-container-title:Studia UBB. Philosophia

Author:

Baker Michael J., , , ,

Abstract

"Notwithstanding the magisterial work of the psychologists H. H. Clark and A. Trognon, in comparison with sociology and linguistics a veritable psychology of dialogue still remains little elaborated. This paper analyses epistemological obstacles facing such an enterprise, arguing that dialogue can not be understood as a ‘window’ on the individual mind. A vision of dialogue as a process of collective thinking, with the exchange as the fundamental unit of analysis, is sketched out. Dialogue is a complex system, involving multidirectional relations between situational representations, communicative action and emergent thinking. Keywords: dialogue, collective thinking, interaction analysis, methodology, complex systems. "

Publisher

Babes-Bolyai University

Subject

General Medicine

Reference42 articles.

1. "1. Airenti, G., Bara, B.G. & Colombetti, M., "Knowledge for Communication", in M.M. Taylor, F. Néel, & D.G. Bouwhuis (Eds.), The Structure of Multimodal Dialogue, Amsterdam: North-Holland, 1989, pp. 145-158.

2. 2. Allwood, J., "Dialog as collective thinking", in P. Pylkkänen, P. Pylkkö, P. A. Hautamäki, A. (Eds.), Brain, Mind and Physics, Amsterdam: IOS Press, 1997, pp. 205-211.

3. 3. Arrow, H., McGrath, J.E. & Berdahl, J.L., Small groups as complex systems, Thousand Oaks: Sage, 2000.

4. 4. Bakeman, R. & Gottman, J.M., Observing Interaction: An introduction to sequential analysis, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997.

5. 5. Baker, M.J., « Les attitudes et leurs révisions dans le dialogue : le cas de la résolution coopérative de problèmes », Psychologie de l'Interaction, n° 11-12, [Numéro spécial, coordonné par P. Marquis & C. Brassac, sur le thème « Révision, cognition et interaction »], 2001, pp. 229-265