Affiliation:
1. Professor of Philosophy of Law, Edinburgh Law School. The article benefited from comments received after my inaugural lecture (during which the argument herein was first aired), and in seminars hosted by the Edinburgh Centre for Legal Theory, Durham Law School (as a JurisNorth event), and Pompeo Fabra University. I would also like to thank the reviewers for very helpful comments
Abstract
This article identifies and explains an important and distinctive way in which a traditional set of private law rules, doctrines, and concepts (ie those that allocate particular goods to particular individuals) relate to distributive justice. Such rules, doctrines, and concepts are instrumentally valuable vis-à-vis a just allocation of goods in two different ways. On the one hand, and less controversially, they sometimes possess the ability to cause (or contribute to causing) such states of affairs into being. The article shows that they also discharge a constitutive function in relation to distributive justice, one that is required by conceptions of distributive justice that are centred around allocation-unbound justificatory criteria (which constitute the vast majority of the available accounts of distributive justice).
Publisher
Edinburgh University Press
Subject
Law,History,Cultural Studies
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献