Abstract
Berkeley is not generally thought of as a lichenologist, but as befi ts any true mycological polymath he did not pass lichens by. He wrestled with their defi nition and classifi cation, and in the 1850s appreciated that the only difference was what we now know as the algal or cyanobacterial partners - way ahead of his contemporaries and the publication of the ‘dual hypothesis’ in 1868. He was fascinated by the circular growth of lichens and recognized the great age colonies could achieve (foreshadowing the birth of lichenometry), pondered any damaging role they might have to leaves and trees, and was intrigued by the wandering manna lichens (occasioning some challenges to his religious convictions). Further, he was a pioneer in describing novel lichenicolous fungi, including some of the most widespread fungal pathogens of lichens. His views in these areas are compared and contrasted with current knowledge, and the name Dothidea hymeniicola Berk. & Broome is reported as referring to an unrecognized species of Endococcus.
Publisher
Edinburgh University Press
Subject
Agricultural and Biological Sciences (miscellaneous),History,Anthropology
Reference62 articles.
1. AINSWORTH, G. C., JAMES, P. W. and HAWKSWORTH, D. L., 1971 Ainsworth and Bisby's dictionary of the fungi. Sixth edition. Kew: Commonwealth Mycological Institute. Pp x, 663.
2. ANONYMOUS, 1873 Schwendener's theory of lichens. Quarterly journal of microscopical science 13: 79.
3. ANTHONY, P. A., HOLTUM, J. A. M. and JACKES, B. R., 2002 Shade acclimation of rainforest leaves to colonization by lichens. Functional ecology 16: 808-816.
4. ARVIDSSON, L., 1978 Svampangrepp på lavr - en orsak till lavöken. Svensk botanisker tidskrift 72: 285-292.
5. XLII.—Notices of British Fungi
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献