Permeable Housing

Abstract

This article explores how water acts on permeable housing and the documentary infrastructures that mitigate its impact and enable its flows. It does so through consideration of ongoing litigation brought by public housing tenants at the remote communities of Ltyentye Apurte (Santa Teresa) and Laramba in the Northern Territory of Australia for incomplete repairs and unsafe drinking water. I offer a distinction between pragmatist and functionalist housing, as competing concepts for framing, respectively, the impact of entrenched low expectations on remote housing performance and management and the minimum amenity that contemporary housing should provide. The litigation by Ltyentye Apurte and Laramba householders is notable for challenging the habitability standard that remote community housing must meet and for introducing the provision of safe drinking water as a matter of habitable housing. While water searches out cracks and refuses expulsion from the housing assemblage, necessitating repairs and maintenance, such mobility provides a challenge for allocating specific obligations to various settler colonial authorities that are collectively involved in maintaining house function. Drawing on close analyses of a series of legal decisions, the article examines how legal frameworks and intra-governmental funding arrangements are employed to eschew responsibility for safe drinking water inside remote community housing.