Taking Advantage of Difference in Opinion

Author:

Bradley Richard

Abstract

ABSTRACTDiversity of opinion both presents problems and affords opportunities. Differences of opinion can stand in the way of reaching an agreement within a group on what decisions to take. But at the same time, the fact that the differences in question could derive from access to different information or from the exercise of different judgemental skills means that they present individuals with the opportunity to improve their own opinions. This paper explores the implications for solutions to the former (aggregation) problem of supposing that individuals exploit these opportunities. In particular, it argues that rational individual revision of opinion implies that aggregation problems are unstable in a certain sense and that solving them by exploiting the information embedded in individual opinion has profound implications for the conditions that we should impose on aggregation procedures.

Publisher

Cambridge University Press (CUP)

Subject

History and Philosophy of Science

Reference22 articles.

1. Combining Probability Distributions: A Critique and Annotated Bibliography;Genest;Statistical Science,1986

2. Interpersonal Comparability and Social Choice Theory

3. Rational Consensus in Science and Society

4. Dietrich F. and List C. (forthcoming) “Arrow's Theorem in Judgement Aggregation”, Social Choice and Welfare

5. Consensus through respect: A model of rational group decision-making

Cited by 11 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. An Interpretation of Weights in Linear Opinion Pooling;Episteme;2020-12-22

2. SUPPORT FOR GEOMETRIC POOLING;The Review of Symbolic Logic;2020-10-21

3. All agreed: Aumann meets DeGroot;Theory and Decision;2017-10-30

4. Learning from others: conditioning versus averaging;Theory and Decision;2017-07-03

5. Aggregation theory and the relevance of some issues to others;Journal of Economic Theory;2015-12

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3