Affiliation:
1. Centre for Offshore Foundation Systems, University of Western Australia Perth, Australia
2. Department of Civil Engineering, University of Hong Kong
3. Department of Engineering, University of Cambridge UK
Abstract
The design of buried anchors and pipelines requires assessment of the peak uplift resistance. This paper describes a limit equilibrium solution for the uplift resistance of pipes and plate anchors buried in sand. The geometry of this solution reflects observations from model tests. Peak angles of friction and dilation are found using established correlations that capture the influence of stress level and density. These angles govern the geometry of the failure mechanism and the mobilised resistance. The solution is validated using a database of 115 model tests on pipes and strip anchors assembled from the published literature. Good agreement with the overall database is shown, without optimisation of any input parameters. The method overpredicts the uplift resistance of smooth model pipes by ∼10%, highlighting the influence of pipe roughness. In contrast, it is shown that the solution for uplift resistance based on the limit theorems of plasticity is generally unconservative. The assumption of normality, which is required by the limit theorems, leads to an unrealistic failure mechanism involving uplift of a far wider zone of soil than is seen in model tests. Plasticity theory, with normality, is inappropriate for modelling this class of kinematically restrained problem in drained conditions, as normality is not observed. As finite element analysis is not routinely used in practice—partly owing to the difficulty in selecting appropriate input parameters to describe dilatancy and plastic flow—the simple analytical idealisation described in this paper provides a useful tool for uplift resistance prediction. Simple charts for the prediction of peak uplift resistance from critical state friction angle, relative density and normalised burial depth are presented, to aid the design of buried pipes and anchors.
Subject
Earth and Planetary Sciences (miscellaneous),Geotechnical Engineering and Engineering Geology
Reference31 articles.
1. Barefoot A. J. Modelling the uplift resistance of buried pipes in a drum centrifuge. MPhil thesis, 1998, Cambridge University Engineering Department.
2. The strength and dilatancy of sands
3. The collapse of diaphragm walls retaining clay
4. Uplift Mechanisms of Pipes Buried in Sand
Cited by
148 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献