Affiliation:
1. Department of Architecture and Civil Engineering, City University of Hong Kong, Tat Chee Avenue, Kowloon, Hong Kong.
Abstract
Site investigation is indispensable in geotechnical practice, but only a small portion of the soil affected by the intended geotechnical construction is examined and/or tested in the laboratory or in situ, leading to significant uncertainties in site investigation results. The uncertainty in the site investigation results depends greatly on the number of specimens tested (i.e. sample size) during site investigation. In many other areas that involve sampling, such as polls, surveys and quality control, sample sizes are often determined using statistical charts, based on the target levels of accuracy and confidence. However, conventional statistical charts, which only deal with independent data, are seldom used in geotechnical site investigation, because geotechnical properties are usually spatially correlated. No statistical chart with consideration of spatial correlation is available for determining sample sizes in geotechnical site investigation. Existing geotechnical design codes around the world (e.g. Eurocode 7) only provide conceptual principles on sample size determination. This study develops statistical charts for determination of sample size at different levels of both accuracy and confidence for geotechnical site investigation. Real cone penetration test data and real laboratory test data are used to illustrate application of the proposed statistical charts, and the charts are shown to perform well.
Subject
Earth and Planetary Sciences (miscellaneous),Geotechnical Engineering and Engineering Geology
Cited by
15 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献