Affiliation:
1. Chairman, Editorial Advisory Panel
Abstract
Good practice develops step-by-step in many different places; comparison, discussion and evaluation are the ways in which best practice is identified. The web has become the prime channel of information transfer but its success in providing access to enormous amounts of information also poses problems for the municipal professional in that they can be overwhelmed by both information and misinformation. The traditional approach to knowledge transfer has been, primarily, through professional journals. The editorial process, ethical standards and peer review has enabled information to be sifted, selected and tested for the benefit of practitioners everywhere. But this approach is being challenged by the new channels of information exchange and communication. This paper proposes that the engineering community must identify ways in which the new channels can be utilised and combined with the virtues of the peer review process for ‘best practice’ to be identified from the mass of information available.
Subject
Civil and Structural Engineering
Reference12 articles.
1. Global issues in public works and municipal engineering
2. Chrimes M. Web 2.0.2008, http://blog.icerecruit.com/?m=200806 (accessed 24/06/2008).
3. Google. 2009, ‘Energy from Waste’ Google search: http://www.google.co.uk (accessed 01/06/2009).
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Briefing: More for less;Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers - Municipal Engineer;2014-12
2. Discussion: Developing best practice: the role of the professional journal;Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers - Municipal Engineer;2011-06
3. Editorial: International Federation of Municipal Engineering;Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers - Municipal Engineer;2010-12