Briefing: The potential of mediating planning and environmental disputes in England and Wales
-
Published:2018-06-01
Issue:3
Volume:171
Page:91-92
-
ISSN:1751-4304
-
Container-title:Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers - Management, Procurement and Law
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers - Management, Procurement and Law
Affiliation:
1. Department of Architecture, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, Scotland
Abstract
Mediation provides a more cost-effective, faster and generally more beneficial form of dispute resolution than litigation for certain types of disputes. It is for these reasons that mediation may be considered a potentially useful form of dispute resolution in the field of planning and environmental disputes in the UK. Mediation for such disputes promises to facilitate participation in planning disputes on a much broader level, thereby promoting inclusiveness and allowing for a broader and thus more accurate range of interests to be taken into account. The flexible nature of mediation also enables the process to be tailored according to the particular features of the individual case. It is within this context that the potential benefits of mediation for environmental and planning disputes should be approached and considered within this briefing, in order to determine whether such benefits are applicable to this type of dispute.
Publisher
Thomas Telford Ltd.
Subject
Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality,General Business, Management and Accounting,Civil and Structural Engineering
Reference14 articles.
1. Barker K 2006 Barker Review of Land Use Planning: Final Report Her Majesty’s Stationery Office Norwich, UK 138
2. A mediation overview: History and dimensions of practice
3. Goldberg SB 2003 Dispute Resolution: Negotiation, Mediation, and Other Processes Aspen Law & Business New York, NY, USA 50 54
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Editorial;Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers - Management, Procurement and Law;2018-06