Field and laboratory study of iron ore tailings–Portland cement blends for dry stacking

Author:

Chaves Laís Rodrigues da Costa1,Heineck Karla Salvagni2,Scheuermann Filho Hugo Carlos3ORCID,Chaves Helder Mansur4,Carvalho João Vítor de Azambuja5ORCID,Wagner Alexia Cindy5ORCID,Silva João Paulo de Sousa6ORCID,Consoli Nilo Cesar7ORCID

Affiliation:

1. PhD candidate, Graduate Program in Civil Engineering, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil

2. Associate Professor, Graduate Program in Civil Engineering, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil

3. Research Fellow, Graduate Program in Civil Engineering, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil

4. Assistant Professor, Civil Engineering Faculty, Universidade Federal do Pará, Belém, PA, Brazil

5. PhD student, Graduate Program in Civil Engineering, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil

6. Expert Engineer, Exploration and Mineral Projects – Mineral Development Centre, VALE S.A., Santa Luzia, MG, Brazil

7. Professor of Civil Engineering, Graduate Program in Civil Engineering, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil (corresponding author: )

Abstract

The dry stacking of filtered tailings has emerged as an alternative way of dealing with the safety-related problems of conventional slurry disposal in reservoirs behind upstream dams. Incorporating a cementing agent into the tailings before compaction can enhance the overall geomechanical behaviour of these structures, giving rise to more stable and safer stackings. However, few dry stacks are in operation worldwide and their field performance needs to be better understood. In addition, the addition of cement provides further challenges to the design of these structures. Obtaining reliable laboratory data for properly designing these tailings storage facilities is thus essential. Accordingly, the mechanical behaviour of artificially cemented iron ore tailings for dry stacking purposes was evaluated, with a focus on comparing the responses between field-compacted samples and laboratory-assembled specimens. To do this, ultrasonic pulse velocity, unconfined compression, split tensile and triaxial compression tests were carried out. Both the stiffness and strength data were well described by the porosity/cement index and, despite minor differences, good agreement was found between the responses of the laboratory-assembled and field-compacted samples. The findings highlight the adequacy of laboratory procedures for reflecting the material's real-field conditions.

Publisher

Thomas Telford Ltd.

Subject

Earth and Planetary Sciences (miscellaneous),Geotechnical Engineering and Engineering Geology

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3