Synthesis of a benchmark exercise for geotechnical analysis of a thermoactive pile

Author:

Habert Julien1,Mroueh Hussein2,Josifovski Josif3,Bogusz Witold4ORCID,Sterpi Donatella5,Georgiadis Konstantinos6

Affiliation:

1. Cerema Nord-Picardie, Lille, France

2. Laboratory of Civil Engineering and Geo-environment of Lille, University of Lille Science and Technologies, Villeneuve d’Ascq, France

3. Department of Geotechnics, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Ss Cyril and Methodius University, Skopje, Republic of North Macedonia

4. Department of Building Structures, Geotechnics and Concrete, Building Research Institute, Warsaw, Poland

5. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Politecnico di Milano, Milan, Italy

6. Department of Civil Engineering, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece

Abstract

Thermoactive piles ensure a dual function: they support mechanically the superstructure and at the same time they are used as heat exchanger elements. In comparison to standard design practice, this requires considering the associated thermal loadings from the operation of the heat exchange system. To assess the thermal effects on the mechanical behaviour, different design assumptions and modelling approaches can be used. Therefore, within the framework of European Cooperation in Science and Technology Action TU1405 ‘Geothermal Applications for Buildings and Infrastructures’, benchmarking of a single geothermal pile has been performed. Hence, both heating and cooling of the pile were considered while different rigidities (representing the upper structure) on the pile head were assumed. The results show that a broad range of design assumptions could be used, which unfortunately lead to noticeable differences. Although the main focus was on the methods and assumptions employed, the exercise also opens questions about the influence of transient effects, thermal strains in the ground, temperature cycles and so on. Owing to the complexity of the topic, some of them were just mentioned, while others were addressed in greater detail. In general, the findings emphasise the need for further practice-oriented guidance to be presented in design guidelines and standards.

Publisher

Thomas Telford Ltd.

Subject

Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law,Nature and Landscape Conservation,Geochemistry and Petrology,Waste Management and Disposal,Geotechnical Engineering and Engineering Geology,Water Science and Technology,Environmental Chemistry,Environmental Engineering

Cited by 7 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3