Affiliation:
1. Assistant Professor, School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Amirkabir University of Technology, Tehran, Iran ()
Abstract
The design of structures based on a design earthquake mainly addresses the direct cost incurred during the construction phase, while the lifetime cost of the structure is often ignored. An investigation was performed on three steel moment-resisting structures of four storeys (case 1), seven storeys (case 2) and ten storeys (case 3) and their life-cycle costs (LCCs) were determined based on different earthquake loads. Each of the structures was designed 14 times: one model for a design earthquake, five models for higher earthquake loads and eight models for lower earthquake loads. The results revealed that none of the structures designed based on the design earthquake provided a minimum LCC. In cases 1 to 3, the LCCs were minimised when a 60%, 50% 40% increase was applied to the design earthquake, respectively. The aim of this work is not to criticise current seismic codes with respect to life safety during an earthquake, but to provoke different parts of engineering communities to think about how an LCC-based design can change costs imposed on their clients, be this the cost of repair and relocation or the cost of injuries and disabilities. The proposed methodology can be used as a case-independent tool for different structures.
Subject
Building and Construction,Civil and Structural Engineering
Reference26 articles.
1. AISC (American Institute of Steel Construction) (2005) AISC341-05: Seismic provisions for structural steel buildings. AISC, Chicago, IL, USA.
2. ATC (Applied Technology Council) (1985) ATC-13. Earthquake Damage Evaluation Data for California. ATC, Redwood City, CA, USA.
3. Risk mitigation of post-earthquake fire in urban buildings
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献