Numerical analysis of field geosynthetic-reinforced retaining walls with secondary reinforcement

Author:

Jiang Y.1,Han J.2,Zornberg J.3,Parsons R. L.2,Leshchinsky D.4,Tanyu B.5

Affiliation:

1. Formerly University of Kansas; now Terracon Consultants, Inc., Savannah, Georgia, USA.

2. Department of Civil, Environmental & Architectural Engineering, The University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS, USA.

3. The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA.

4. ADAMA Engineering, Inc., Clackamas, OR, USA.

5. George Mason University, Fairfax, VA, USA.

Abstract

Geosynthetic-reinforced retaining (GRR) walls typically have vertical reinforcement spacing of 0·6 m, and this relatively large spacing has been known to cause comparatively high connection forces. To reduce this connection force, short geosynthetic reinforcement layers (referred to as secondary reinforcement layers) are installed between blocks where there are no primary reinforcement layers. This paper presents two-dimensional numerical simulations that were developed to analyse an instrumented GRR wall with secondary reinforcement layers in the field. A finite differential software was employed to develop the numerical model. In addition to the Mohr–Coulomb model, the cap yield model based on the theory of hardening plasticity was used to represent the behaviour of backfill. Inclinometer casings, earth pressure cells and strain gauges were installed in the instrumented GRR walls to measure the facing deflections, lateral earth pressures, vertical earth pressures and geogrid strains. The measured results and numerical predictions were compared and discussed, and reasonable agreement between these results was found. Compared to the measured results, the numerical predictions slightly underestimated the maximum wall facing deflections and vertical earth pressures, and slightly overestimated lateral earth pressures and strains in primary and secondary reinforcement layers. For comparison, a numerical model without secondary reinforcement was developed as well. This comparison revealed that the GRR wall with secondary reinforcement resulted in smaller facing deflections and maximum strains in primary reinforcement layers. Overall, the numerical analysis indicated that secondary reinforcement could provide clear benefits in improving the performance of GRR walls.

Publisher

Thomas Telford Ltd.

Subject

Earth and Planetary Sciences (miscellaneous),Geotechnical Engineering and Engineering Geology

Reference26 articles.

1. Christopher, B. R., Gill, S. A., Giroud, J. P., Juran, I. Scholsser, F., Mitchell, J. K. & Dunnicliff, J. (1989). Reinforced soil structures, volume II. Summary of research and systems information, Report No. FHWA-RD-89-043. Washington, DC, USA: Federal Highway Administration.

2. Duncan, J. M., Byrne, P. M., Wong, K. S. & Mabry, P. (1980). Strength, stress–strain and bulk modulus parameters for finite element analyses of stresses and movements in soil masses, Report No. UCB/GT/80-01. Berkeley, CA, USA: Department of Civil Engineering, University of California.

3. Numerical analysis of reinforced soil-retaining wall structures with cohesive and granular backfills

Cited by 48 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3