Affiliation:
1. School of Built & Natural Environment, University of Central Lancashire,Preston, UK
Abstract
The analytic hierarchy process (AHP) has been proposed by several authors as a method of contractor selection that eliminates the shortcomings of the ‘lowest bidder’ approach commonly used in the construction industry. Most authors only demonstrate the conceptual model for using AHP in contractor selection with hypothetical data. The objective of this study was to take the process a step further by using real-life project data. The study also sought to compare the ranking of contractors with the ‘lowest bidder’ method and AHP. The study concluded that the ranking of the contractors by AHP differed from their ‘lowest bidder’ ranking for most of the contractors (about 68%). This suggests that the extra effort required using AHP compared to using the ‘lowest bidder’ method is justified. However, the reliability of these results is limited by the fact that they are based on a single case only.
Subject
Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality,General Business, Management and Accounting,Civil and Structural Engineering
Cited by
6 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献