Abstract
Our paper examines whether certain social, political, and economic factors influence citizens’ desire to participate in co-operative projects, thereby increasing co-operatives’ significance. Specifically, we analyse the relationship between co-operatives’ significance and four factors: (1) citizens’ sense of community; (2) the quality of a country’s democracy; (3) citizens’ trust in government; and (4) a country’s economic performance. The empirical analysis is conducted on a sample of 25 European countries. The results highlight that the most significant factors influencing co-operatives’ significance are trust in government, followed by the quality of a country’s democracy and its economic performance. Furthermore, co-operatives’ employment has a significant correlation with both the sense of community and economic performance. We argue that a dynamic learning process, which develops over time, cultivates a stronger sense of community, thereby leading to increased commitment to co-operative employment. Concerning economic performance, our findings reveal a negative relationship, thus supporting the notion of a relative counter-cyclical association.
Publisher
UK Society for Co-operative Studies
Reference68 articles.
1. Bell, K., & Reed, M. (2022). The tree of participation: A new model for inclusive decision-making. Community Development Journal, 57(4), 595-614.
2. Bianchi, M. (2023). How social profiles influence community entrepreneurs' capacity to develop networks. A Bourdieuan perspective on Italian community co-operatives. Community Development Journal, 58(2), 328-348.
3. Co-operatives, territories and social capital: Reconsidering a theoretical framework;Bianchi;International Journal of Social Economics,2020
4. Billiet, A., Dufays, F., Friedel, S., & Staessens, M. (2021). The resilience of the cooperative model: How do cooperatives deal with the COVID-19 crisis? Strategic Change, 30(2), 99-108.
5. Birchall, J. (1999). What makes people participate in cooperatives? Towards a theoretical model. Journal of Rural Cooperation, 27(1), 3-15.