Medical parole: Chinese experience and comparative legal analysis with Russian legislation-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Medical parole: Chinese experience and comparative legal analysis with Russian legislation

Published:2023-09-29 Issue:2 Volume:18 Page:234-241
ISSN:2072-2427
Container-title:Penal law
language:en
Short-container-title:

Author:

Myakhanova Aleksandra¹,Gunzinov Jargal²,Skiba Andrey Petrovich³

Affiliation:

1. Buryatskiy gosudarstvennyy universitet imeni Dorzhi Banzarova

2. Dorzhi Banzarov Buryat State University

3. Academy of the FPS of Russia

Abstract

The article, based on the study of Chinese legislation and the explanations of the Supreme People’s Court of China, concludes that in fact the state of health of convicts is one of the grounds for their parole. This Chinese approach emphasizes the preventive importance of the institution of parole and seems justified, since it allows taking into account both the behavior of a convicted person to imprisonment and his state of health when deciding on his early release (in contrast to the Russian experience). A list of numerous diseases is given, in the presence of which in China it is possible to release convicts on parole for medical reasons.

Publisher

Academy of the FPS of Russia

Reference8 articles.

1. Маликов Б. З. Выражение и реализация уголовной ответственности в наказании и некарательных мерах уголовно-правового характера // Человек: преступление и наказание. 2014. № 4(87). С. 10-16., Malikov, B. Z. 2014, ‘Expression and implementation of criminal responsibility in punishment and non-punitive measures of a criminal nature’, Man: crime and punishment, iss. 4(87), pp. 10-16.

2. Санташов А. Л., Скаков А. Б. Идея прогрессивной системы исполнения уголовных наказаний и ее развитие в отечественной пенитенциарной науке // Пенитенциарная наука. 2020. Т. 14, № 2(50). С. 176-184., Santashov, A. L. & Skakov, A. B. 2020, ‘The idea of a progressive system of execution of criminal penalties and its development in the domestic penitentiary science’, Penitentiary Science, vol. 14, iss. 2(50), pp. 176-184.

3. Институт условно-досрочного освобождения в разных странах и его совершен- ствование в Российской Федерации / Т. Л. Боякова и [др.] // Вестник Воронежского ин- ститута ФСИН России. 2020. № 1. С. 164-169., Bojakova, T. L., Churakov, V. G., Lopina, M. V. & Solomatin, S. V. 2020, ‘The Institute of Parole in Different Countries and its improvement in the Russian Federation’, Bulletin of the Voronezh Institute of the Federal Penitentiary Service of Russia, iss. 1, pp. 164-169.

4. Мяханова А. Н., Дондокова М. Ю. О некоторых аспектах условно-досрочного освобождения в постановлении Пленума Верховного Суда РФ и пояснении Верховного народного суда КНР: сравнительно-правовой анализ // Российский судья. 2020. № 9. С. 26-30., Mjahanova, A. N. & Dondokova, M. Ju. 2020, ‘On some aspects of parole in the resolution of the Plenum of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation and the explanation of the Supreme People’s Court of the People’s Republic of China: Comparative Legal Analysis’, Russian Judge, iss. 9, pp. 26-30.

5. Мяханова А. Н. К вопросу о критериях условно-досрочного освобождения: анализ балльной системы оценки исправления осужденных в Китае // Уголовно-исполнительное право. 2022. Т. 17(1-4), № 4. С. 521-528., Mjahanova, A. N. 2022, ‘On the issue of criteria for parole: Analysis of the point system for assessing the correction of convicts in China’, Penal law, vol. 17(1-4), iss. 4, pp. 521-528.