Affiliation:
1. Institute of Biology of the Karelian Research Centre of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Pushkinskaya St. 11, 185910 Petrozavodsk, Russia
Abstract
The paper examines the population dynamics of common species of small mammals in southern Karelia (Sorex araneus L., 1758 and Myodes glareolus Scherber, 1780) based on the results of long-term stationary studies. Small mammals in the study area were captured in the summer and autumn of the period 1966–2014 using standard snap trap lines. At each trapping session, all habitat types were sampled. The dominant species in the small mammal population, like anywhere in Eastern Fennoscandia, were Sorex araneus and Myodes glareolus. Both dominant species live here at the edge of their ranges. As a result of the data analysis of the long-term abundance of these small mammal species, the presence of two time periods (1966–1990 and 1991–2014) was established, differing for each of the species under consideration in the nature of changes in abundance. For both the common shrew and the bank vole in the second period, a change in the nature of population cyclicity was noted, expressed by a change from a tendency toward 3–4-year cycles to chaotic fluctuations. Also, a decrease in the amplitude of population fluctuations was observed for both species. For the bank vole, there was also a decrease in the population level. A discrepancy was noted in the previously existing correlation of the long-term abundance of the background species. The probable reason for such changes is the warming of the climate observed in the north of Eurasia in the 21st century. For peripheral populations of small mammals, endogenous factors regulating numbers come to the fore. This influence is indirect, as warmer winters and springs create more favorable living conditions for animals.
Publisher
Zoological Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Reference64 articles.
1. Angelstam P., Lindström E. and Widén P. 1985. Synchronous short-term population fluctuations of some birds and mammals in Fennoscandia – occurrence and distribution. Ecography, 8(4): 285–298. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0587.1985.tb01181.x
2. Balakirev A.E., Okulova N.M. and Ivanter E.V. 2004. On the analysis of factor influences on the long-term dynamics of the number of common shrews in the north and south of the range. Povolzhskiy Journal of Ecology, 2: 111–122. [In Russian].
3. Becker-Scarpitta A., Antão L.H., Schmidt N.M., Blanchet F.G., Kaarlejärvi E., Raundrup K. and Roslin T. 2023. Diverging trends and drivers of Arctic flower production in Greenland over space and time. Polar Biology, 46: 837–848. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00300-023-03164-2
4. Berteaux D., Humphries M.M., Krebs C.J., Lima M., McAdam A.G., Pettorelli N., Reale D., Saitoh T., Tkadlec E., Weladji R.B. and Stenseth N.C. 2006. Constraints to projecting the effects of climate change on mammals. Climate Research, 32: 151–158. https://doi.org/10.3354/cr032151
5. Bierman S.M., Fairbairn J.P., Petty S.J., Elston D.A., Tidhar D. and Lambin X. 2006. Changes over time in the spatiotemporal dynamics of cyclic populations of field voles (Microtus agrestis L.). The American Naturalist, 167(4): 583–590. https://doi.org/10.1086/501076