Affiliation:
1. Zoological Institute, Russian Academy of Sciences, Universitetskaya Emb. 1, 199034, St. Petersburg, Russia
Abstract
The search for practical criteria for delimiting species was always topical. The waves of species splitting and lumping always altered depending both from dominant species concept, fashion and methods applied. Starting from the end of the last century the description of species diversity is at the peak of splitting wave. The specific feature of current splitting wave is that it relies 1) on new wide array of characters – molecular markers with their universality and easy application; 2) wide application of molecular markers in its turn gave birth to new methodology – phylogenetic analysis penetrates to intraspecies level, new direction of studies – phylogeography (Avise et al., 1987) appears and explosively develops. Phylogeography very successfully fall on phylogenetic species concept using gene trees as the basis for delimiting species and this «tree-thinking» approach together with widely expanding studies on phylogeography lead to dramatic increase in species number practically in all groups of vertebrates. Unlike morphological characters, molecular markers are universal (occur in all or almost in all organisms) and genetic distances, therewith, at a first glance gave an universal metrics for delimiting species which could be applied to almost all groups. Thus remarkable and long-awaited perspective opens- systematics receive an universal tool for distinguishing and delimitation of species. However, this hope on universal criteria once again appeared to be false and all issues which rise while working with molecular markers are very similar to those one have using morphological approach. In other words application of molecular markers bring us back to old and well known issues major part of which currently has no solution and the feeling that biologists at last have gain a unit similar to exact sciences is very wrong.
Publisher
Zoological Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Subject
Insect Science,Animal Science and Zoology,Aquatic Science,Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
Reference54 articles.
1. Абрамсон Н.И. 2007. Филогеография: итоги, проблемы, перспективы. Вестник ВОГиС, 11, 2: 307–331.
2. Абрамсон Н.И., Родченкова Е.Н. и Костыгов А.Ю. 2009. Генетическая изменчивость и филогеография рыжей полевки (Clethrionomys glareolus, Arvicolinae, Rodentia) на территории России с анализом зоны интрогресии мт ДНК близкородственного вида – красной полевки (Сl. rutilus). Генетика, 45, 5: (в печати).
3. Абрамсон Н.И., Родченкова Е.Н., Фокин М.В., Ракитин С.Б. и Гилева Э.А. 2009. Современная и историческая интрогрессия митохондриальной ДНК между красной (Сlethrionomys rutilus) и рыжей (Clethrionomys glareolus) полевками (Rodentia, Cricetidae). Доклады Российской Академии Наук, 425, № 3: 415–418
4. Дарвин Ч. 1991. Происхождение видов путем естественного отбора или сохранение благоприятных рас в борьбе за жизнь. Пер. с 6-го издания (Лондон 1872). Отв. ред. А.Л. Тахтаджян. Издательство «Наука», Санкт-Петербург, 540 с.
5. Майр Э. 1971. Принципы зоологической систематики. Издательство «Мир», Москва, 454 с.
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献