Eudiaptomus transylvanicus and E. vulgaris (Copepoda: Calanoida: Diaptomidae): comparative morphology, distribution and ecology-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Eudiaptomus transylvanicus and E. vulgaris (Copepoda: Calanoida: Diaptomidae): comparative morphology, distribution and ecology

Published:2022-04-11 Issue:1 Volume:31 Page:42-54
ISSN:2410-0226
Container-title:Zoosystematica Rossica
language:en
Short-container-title:Zoosystematica Rossica

Author:

Podshivalina V.N.¹^ORCID,Sheveleva N.G.²^ORCID,Semenova A.S.³^ORCID,Mirabdullayev I.M.⁴^ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Chuvash State University, 15 Moskovskiy Ave., Cheboksary 428015, Russia; Prisurskiy State Nature Reserve, 9 Lesnoy, Cheboksary 428034, Russia

2. Limnological Institute, Siberian Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences, 3 Ulan-Batorskaya St., Irkutsk 664033, Russia

3. Atlantic Branch of the Russian Federal Research Institute of Fisheries and Oceanography VNIRO (AtlantNIRO), 5 Dmitriy Donskoy St., Kaliningrad 236022, Russia

4. Tashkent State Agrarian University, 2 Universitetskaya St., Tashkent 100140, Uzbekistan

Abstract

Two closely related, difficult to diagnose calanoid copepod species, Eudiaptomus transylvanicus (Daday, 1891) and E. vulgaris (Schmeil, 1898), were studied based on the new material from the Sura River floodplain (the Middle Volga region, European Russia). The redescriptions and illustrations of two species are provided. The main diagnostic differences between these species are refined. New characters useful in the identification of E. transylvanicus are proposed. The data on distribution and habitats of the two species are reviewed and briefly analysed.

Publisher

Zoological Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences

Subject

Animal Science and Zoology,Insect Science,Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

Reference50 articles.

1. Błędzki L.A. & Rybak J.I. 2016. Freshwater crustacean zooplankton of Europe: Cladocera & Copepoda (Calanoida, Cyclopoida). Key to species identification, with notes on ecology, distribution, methods and introduction to data analysis. Springer Publishers. xv + 918 p. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-29871-9

2. Borutzky E.B., Stepanova L.A. & Kos M.S. 1991. Opredelitel’ Calanoida presnykh vod SSSR [Key to the freshwater calanoids of the USSR]. In: Opredeliteli po faune SSSR, izdavaemye Zoologicheskim institutom Akedemii Nauk SSSR [Guides to the fauna of the USSR published by the Zoological Institute of the Academy of Sciences of the USSR], 157: 1–504. St Petersburg: Nauka. (In Russian with English summary).

3. Brancelj A. & Blejec A. 1994. Diurnal vertical migration of Daphnia hyalina Leydig, 1860 (Crustacea: Cladocera) in Lake Bled (Slovenia) in relation to temperature and predation. Hydrobiologia, 284: 125–136. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00006884

4. Daday E. 1891. A Magyarországi Diaptomus-fajok ätnézete [A conspect of Diaptomus of the Hungarian fauna]. Természetrajzu Füzetek, Kiadja a Magyar Nemzeti Múzeum, 13: 114–143. (In Hungarian).

5. Damian-Georgescu A. 1966. Calanoida. Fauna Republicii Socialiste România, 4(8): 1–30. Bucaresti: Editura Academiei Republicii Socialiste România. (In Romanian).