Evaluating the effectiveness of scientometric indicators use in Russia’s science administration

Author:

Bratchenko Svetlana1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Institute of Economics Russian Academy of Sciences

Abstract

The article presents the results of research on the effectiveness of scientometric indicators use in science management in Russia (on the example of economic science in 2005-2018). The investigation rests on empirical base of publications indexed in the Russian science index. The author argues that the use of bibliometric indicators (in the form they appeared in government documents between 2009 and 2018) encourages the publication activity rather than actual scientific results. The paper offers the method to evaluate the effectiveness of a scientific paper differentiating the ways and effects of dissemination of scientific ideas in a scientific community. The method helped identify a significant increase in the overall number and the share of articles which do not influence further development of science (i.e. ineffective papers). The drop in the number of effective papers is accompanied by a significant cost rise, which also means a drop in effectiveness (3.9 times according to the empirical data).

Publisher

Faculty of Economics, Lomonosov Moscow State University

Subject

Electrical and Electronic Engineering,Building and Construction

Reference45 articles.

1. И. К. О некоторых условиях, способствующих умножению народного капитала // Вестник Московского университета. Серия 6: Экономика. — 2016. — № 4. — С. 35—60.

2. Балацкий Е. В., Екимова Н. А. Проблема манипулирования в системе РИНЦ // Вестник УрФУ. Серия: Экономика и управление. — 2015. — № 2. — С. 166 – 178.

3. Боричевский И. А. Науковедение как точная наука // Вестник знания. — 1926. — № 12. — С. 777–786.

4. Братченко С. А. Формирование фундаментальных управленческих идей в период становления капитализма (краткий обзор научных работ) // Управленческие науки. — 2018. — № 1. — С. 110–118.

5. Бубнова Н. А., Варзин С. А., Матвеев В. В., Пискун О. Е., Чурилов Л. П., Шишкин А. Н., Эрман М. В. Наукометрический бум: за и против // Наука, инновации и образование. — 2017. — № 1. — С. 112–122.

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Managing effi ciency in sport: evidence of Formula 1 Williams GP team;Moscow University Economics Bulletin;2022-09-19

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3