Affiliation:
1. Institute for Applied Economic Studies, Russian Academy of National Economy and Public Administration
2. Faculty of Economics, Lomonosov Moscow State University
Abstract
This work is devoted to the study of the impact of urban development on interethnic intolerance. Although studies on the impact of urbanization and the economic well-being of cities on interethnic intolerance have been conducted in other countries, no similar scientific work has been conducted in Russia. The purpose of this paper is to determine factors related to urban development that influence the level of interethnic intolerance in a Russian city and to clarify the nature of this influence. The assumption of the presence of such an influence is based on the fact that the comfort of the urban environment can play the role of an indicator of economic well-being, while the exacerbation of social conflicts during periods of economic instability is scientifically substantiated. This influence is studied using an econometric study on a sample of 66 Russian cities with a population of over 100 thousand people, where 2 or more crimes motivated by interethnic intolerance were committed during the period 2007–2019. The information base for the study
was obtained from the website of the SOVA Center for Information and Analysis, the statistical databases of Rosstat and EMISS, and the official website of the urban environment quality index. Based on the results obtained, it is concluded that interethnic intolerance is reduced due to a comfortable urban environment. Also, according to the study, in more populated Russian cities the level of interethnic intolerance is higher, whereas the incomes of city residents reduce it.
Publisher
Faculty of Economics, Lomonosov Moscow State University
Subject
Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering,Polymers and Plastics,Business and International Management
Reference36 articles.
1. Achkasov, V. A. (2008). Konfliktnyj potencial jetnofederalizma. Politicheskaja Jekspertiza: POLITEKS, 8(2), 27–43 (Conflict potential of ethnofederalism. Political expertise: POLITEX, 8(2), 27–43).
2. Acolin, A., Bostic, R., & Painter, G. (2016). A field study of rental market discrimination across origins in France. Journal of Urban Economics, 95, 49–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jue.2016.07.003
3. Ager, P., & Brueckner, M. (2018). Immigrants’ genes: Genetic diversity and economic development in the United States. Economic Inquiry, 56(2), 1149–1164. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecin.12540
4. Alesina, A., Baqir, R., & Easterly, W. (1999). Public goods and ethnic divisions. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 114(4), 1243–1284. https://doi.org/10.1162/003355399556269
5. Alesina, A., & La Ferrara, E. (2005). Ethnic diversity and economic performance. Journal of Economic Literature, 43(3), 762–800. https://doi.org/10.1257/002205105774431243