Abstract
During the 1970s several proposals to set up employee investment funds were brought to the fore in Scandinavia. In 1984, wage earner funds were introduced in Sweden. The experiment, however, was short-lived and partly a failure. In Denmark, the debate on economic democracy is almost non-existent today, and in Norway, the funds idea never gained ground at all. The hypothesis stated in this article, is that collective strategies which include all employees, or large groups of employees, are hard to realize within a highly diversified labour market. It is also argued that pension funds can prove to be significant devices for industrial purposes and employment, and that employee ownership can imply co-optation or an enlargement of employee influence. If employees enter the capital market to a greater extent, it can also imply a new role for the trade unions.
Subject
Management of Technology and Innovation,Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management,Strategy and Management,General Business, Management and Accounting
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献